2 March 2007 | 7 replies
Surely, you could find bad deals right there in California.
11 April 2007 | 9 replies
Potentially very bad!
2 March 2007 | 0 replies
This can be bad news for an industry that is still trying to regain its equilibrium.
7 March 2007 | 13 replies
Using an example that I am currentlylooking at the numbers work using the cents on the dollar/equity method but don't look particular good using the traditional 70% of ARV (After Repaired Value) less repairs method.For example:Purchase price: 150,000ARV: 220,000Repair Cost: 30,000150/220=.68 cents on the dollar100-68=32% equityOR70% of 220,000= 154,000 less $30,000 = $124,000Based on the first method, the deal doesn't look bad, no?
27 March 2007 | 13 replies
Too bad there aren't more like you.
5 March 2007 | 7 replies
It's not a bad loan but you have the normal underwriting structure.
7 March 2007 | 10 replies
I want to make sure I understand what you are saying.In the example with the 13k to 50k in two years time are you saying that was a bad investment period, or just a bad investment for a beginning investor?
2 July 2007 | 7 replies
I've had bad checks come back as long as 12 days after they were written.Good Luck,Mike