
22 January 2025 | 13 replies
In my mind, the liability and possibility of harming the seller outweigh the rewards.

22 January 2025 | 12 replies
I am asking anyone knowledgeable to provide any measures or strategies that could materially make a difference in heading off the risk of serious financial harm of the eviction process with non-paying tenants.

21 January 2025 | 6 replies
We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

21 January 2025 | 10 replies
I guess one should always consider that the rate is always based on FULL loss and FULL replacement, so I guess there's no harm in asking, though your results may not be as advantageous as a layman might consider.Thanks all for your input.

20 January 2025 | 5 replies
We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

18 January 2025 | 15 replies
I sincerely hope you, your family and friends are safe and not in harm's way.

22 January 2025 | 203 replies
Took collective criminals about a week to figure out new PD policy was if no person in risk or harmed, don't pursue, stop by when available IF available.

16 January 2025 | 8 replies
No harm no foul.

14 January 2025 | 329 replies
Pregerson ruled on November 13, 2020 that the apartment owners had failed to show “irreparable harm” because (a) there was no immediate threat of foreclosure, and (b) the City Moratorium appeared to be “imminently reasonable” in the context of the unprecedented pandemic.[3]"https://www.natlawreview.com/a...Pretty sad that the judiciary is passing the buck to the legislature and not wanting to get involved.

7 January 2025 | 7 replies
One bad situation can harm all the properties.