That's exactly how I think about it too.

These are strictly for investment purposes only.

This means using the same application form, asking the same standard questions, and running the exact same checks (like credit, income, and rental history) for every single person who applies, regardless of who they are.

Exactly right @John Underwood.

My first retail deal I didn't gross up the operating expenses to 100% occupancy for CAM purposes, and that cost me real money when occupancy dropped.The other big shift: tenant quality matters differently.

If it's possible, how exactly would that work while being with a company?

These aren’t contradictory, you’re just mixing up lender rules with tax rules.A 10% down second-home loan is about occupancy/financing.The 14-day / 10% rule is about IRS tax treatment.So yes, a property can qualify as a second home and be a personal residence for tax purposes.

In order to do this, we must be in the right mindset to achieve these goals, because it is no easy task.Scott maps out a doable plan for savings and investing, he presents well-researched and detailed information to support his plan, and uses realistic examples to highlight the benefits of following his advice.Scott outlines a plan for living a frugal lifestyle for the purpose of getting our finances on track and in a controlled state.

The area is EXACTLY where I want to live at, but I just don't qualify through a regular bank because they say I don't make enough to suppose it.

I’m always interested in serious critique.You can explain to everyone who see's this post exactly where my model breaks, who's doing it better, and why you felt the need to try to dunk on me on my own post. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L8iiyTrJILLxWybHQJIsp1PbRHGOYeOqAtIFSuK6jLM/edit?