It can be a proportion of the rental income, or a flat fee.

This is one of the pitfalls of having rental properties in an S Corporation that investors are often unaware of.Also, keep in mind that if Tracy’s S Corp had other owners besides herself, then the other shareholders would not have been very happy with her when she transferred that property, as they would have also been required pay tax on that gain in proportion to their share of the S Corporation.

Whereas with a Roth 401k, both the basis and interest have to be distributed proportionally.

It seems risk and Cash Flow need to be proportional.

Unfair as it seems, the crazy party that one roommate threw can result in a termination notice directed to all tenants.In Legal Terms:“Joint and several liability” is where two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability.Under joint and several liability or all sums, a claimant may pursue an obligation against any one party as if they were jointly liable and it becomes the responsibility of the defendants to sort out their respective proportions of liability and payment.This means that if the claimant pursues one defendant and receives payment, that defendant must then pursue the other obligors for a contribution to their share of the liability.This obligation is normally spelled out in a lease clause, in leases which are signed by two or more tenants.

Blown out of proportion or a real concern?

SUPER unlikely, but when you smooth it out across 100 flips, the proportion becomes more normal.

Has the OH market fundamentals changed in matching proportion to RAISE that market fundamental to meet the out-state valuation?     

As others have mentioned, the Smokies home values are proportionally dependent upon the revenue stream.

And what proportion of CASH purchases is sold to hedge funds, foreign investors, domestic investors, asset management firms like Black Rock and etc.?