10 July 2024 | 256 replies
Examples of permissible activities include the preparation professional scholarly articles for publication and participation in seminars, lectures, and civic programs.A Member who writes or speaks for the purpose of educating members of the public shall never imply that he or she is speaking on behalf of any other entity, including RMAI, unless specifically authorized to do so.A Member should report unethical behavior of others to the appropriate governing body.CANON 6 – RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMAn RMAI Member shall always demonstrate respect for the judicial system which shall be revealed through the absence of litigation (or threat of litigation) that is intended to harass or maliciously injure another or knowingly violates local, state, or federal laws or court rules adopted for the bringing of an action before the judiciary.Commentary:A Member may, where permissible under the bounds of the law, exercise its reasonable judgment in pursuing with ardor legally owed obligations.A Member may test the bounds of law when faced with issues that are new, uncertain, or have contradictory treatment by the courts, regulators, or in statute but shall not assert a position that is frivolous or for the purpose of harassing another.A Member may, in good faith and within the bounds of the law, take steps to test the correctness of a ruling of a tribunal or the validity of a statute or regulation, provided they proceed with caution, demonstrate respect for the judicial, executive, or legislative entity being challenged, and strive to comply with the existing ruling, regulation, or statute until such time that it is overturned or otherwise changed.A Member should treat proceedings that may occur in quasi-judicial or administrative systems with the same respect as they would with proceedings before the judicial system.A Member shall not give or lend anything of value to a judge, official, or employee of a tribunal before which it has business.CANON 7 – RESPECT FOR THE ASSOCIATIONAn RMAI Member shall always demonstrate respect for RMAI which shall be revealed through their cooperation in adhering to the RMAI Bylaws, RMAI Code of Ethics, and as applicable the RMAI Certification Program and through prompt responses to correspondence from RMAI staff, RMAI agents, the RMAI Ethics Committee, RMAI Certification Audit Committee, or RMAI Certification Remediation Committee concerning alleged, perceived, or actual violations of the Bylaws, Code of Ethics, or Certification Program.Commentary:Membership in RMAI is a privilege and not a right.
26 January 2023 | 65 replies
What makes you choose it over Turner's BP bigger book?
14 June 2021 | 334 replies
In reality it will do the exact opposite.This would be a more accurate headline: California legislature votes to overturn the law of Supply and DemandGood luck with that, California.Another quote from H.L.
30 September 2021 | 321 replies
Courts would not overturn what Governors are doing.
29 December 2017 | 86 replies
To each his own of course I've dealt with fashion superstars and section 8 and I'm pretty happy with the way I do it. 100% agree with poster above that no one could do it as good as me, at some point I'll turn it over.
23 June 2019 | 32 replies
Just caught this article today.https://www.npr.org/2019/06/22/734919303/supreme-court-overturns-precedent-in-property-rights-case-a-sign-of-things-to-co
21 July 2017 | 19 replies
That was overturned by the courts as unconstitutional.I like Florissant and I'm all for measures keeping the neighborhood in a safe, clean, livable condition.
17 May 2024 | 25 replies
A frustrated sister of mine who was her self appointed power of attorney is angry with me taking care of mom - so using her 32 years of legal secretary experience - to illegally become power of attorney she files a lawsuit to get me evicted claiming $2300 rent due for past 19 months = $43000 - it was overturned for many reasons.
6 February 2024 | 67 replies
I think the suit would be for specific performance not to overturn the sale.
7 May 2024 | 13 replies
That said, no CPA worth their salt would take a wrong position just because they think the chances of it being audited are slim.Interesting nugget - the IRS even has a form for disclosing to them in the event that you think you are taking a position that is contrary to IRS guidance - Form 8275 - and if you validly disclose your position on this form you can avoid penalties if the position is overturned.