You are buying far below "as-is" value. and Your $10,000 in repairs brings $30,000 in gross "value added"which we will assume for your market at this time is the standard return.Please, no one come in and tell me about cost of sale, commissions, how my $10K may cost another Investor $20K and why should I be harmed for that etc.

Please keep in mind that I'm acting with the best intentions, and mean no harm.

I agree that the media negative on investors and "flipping" does in deed cause harm to our bottom lines through new government rules, laws, regulations, hinderences, etc. and it is important that we do have a "voice".

I just don't think banks should be regulating the real estate industry by imposing restrictions.FHA was wise enough to realize that imposing such restrictions does more harm to the economy than good.

"[1] The equitable interest is a right in equity that, if violated (suffers a harm), is subject to satisfaction by an equitable remedy.BTW My local board challenged my position and came to the agreement that I was correct.

Morally I guess it’s up to you, I figure if I don’t someone else will so what’s the harm.

This is all to say that in addition to proximity to workplace, quality of schools, etc, there's a premium put on the relative diversity and openness I would argue.

I've borrowed money from family, it depends who they are and their situation and ur relationship with them, if u can lend from Dad instead of bank knowing relationship is stable then it's a good option.Sometimes lending fri family can be hard coz being a slave to the lender can turn things around therefore harming the relationship.If it's working for both of use and is win win then great I think.I have been in trouble before and not able to pay back for some time but it never harmed relationship coz my family didn't ever hold anything against me.

These rules, which include a requirement that sellers set aside a portion of the purchase price for buyer-agent commissions, prohibitions on modifying the commission, and permission to filter listings by commission, all enable NAR, its co-defendants, and its members to maintain buyer-agent commissions at supra-competitive levels unrelated to brokers’ experience or the services provided, steer home buyers away from lower commission homes, and drive out discounters—among other harms."

I can’t prove the cat died from toxicity but even putting a pets in harms way is completely unacceptable.Are there grounds for non- renewal of lease even if toxic traps as a prohibited item were not on the contract?