I had the intention of buying another program if I felt it would help me in my business.

When dealing with a homeowner you are dealing with a product consumer, when dealing with a commercial property investor you are dealing with a business person.Most commercial owners (or their brokers) will recognize your offer for what it is - a free option for you to try to find a buyer at a higher price, that will only close if you can find the ultimate buyer, with no intention on your part to close on the purchase yourself (and from what you said probably not having the financial means to close yourself anyway).For any seller the strongest offer is an all cash, no financing offer with no contingencies.

I have no question who I am here to serve, and after meeting the other parasites at the local REIA, I have no question that at least my intentions are in the right place.Of course if you have advice or suggestions on how to learn or grow, I'd appreciate it.

Nothing against the company you are "pushing", just wondering about your intent....

Hi, as to the practice of law without a license (LOL) if a Realtor is writing down what the buyer/seller are directing them to do and it does not materially change the intent of or meaning of the written contract, say default provisions being modified, that is usually not considered practicing law.

I know that there will be a 10% penalty, but with both of us still working full-time we would absorb that penalty.In terms of a rollover, my intention is to rollover in a SDIRA for the purposes of real estate.

Thank you for clarifying your intents...sorry I misinterpreted earlier...

If your intention is to finance it you should just offer it as a financed deal.

Any judge is not going to look at your definition and title, they will be looking at what you do and then the intent of the law.Jon is absolutely correct, the financial arena is tightly regulated.

When partnering with the intent of learning (not just a bird dog), it is important to work with a good team.