
28 May 2015 | 11 replies
@Ray H. thanks a lot, I may be using one of the methods you suggested if either of these two properties I'm looking at checks out

30 March 2016 | 20 replies
They are aware the basketball issue has been taken care of, but send a letter each time the kid brings it out to play (this is what is allowed per the CC&R's).

27 June 2015 | 37 replies
I've noticed that this ratio stays consistent regardless of the method of drawing those leads.

4 January 2016 | 59 replies
Fellipe Originally posted by @Matt R.

13 May 2015 | 7 replies
I can follow up with you to see what the local experts think about what is the best method in limiting any tree loss/damage to the property.

13 May 2015 | 0 replies
From what I can see, the deed method can involve some more up-front costs, some of which you can negotiate or opt not to have (seller buyout - unless seller agrees to wait; attorney if you want one involved; recording deed; notary, etc).

13 May 2015 | 2 replies
While I understand the methods you described for obtaining loans and renting properties when it's acceptable, I'm still trying to figure out how one can use that rental income to count toward their overall income when they go to qualify for the next purchase.
15 May 2015 | 5 replies
At the same time you do need to have a least a little bit of patience for these methods to generate enough leads.

18 May 2015 | 36 replies
The bulk of the properties that are above 1.5% (and they come and go) are typically within the Kansas City limits and are usually what I'd call "B-" neighborhoods.Occasionally we have some outside KC in the suburbs, like the one we have right now on East 129 Street in Grandview has a 1.7% R/V ratio ($57,000 turnkey renting for $950/mo).They come and go, especially the ones with higher R/V ratios.Continued success!