A master lease to a reputable company sounds good. 

They have all been great.This company was referred to me by the leak expert.

Your main property is also less leveraged so you IRR or return on equity will take a hiti agree with others, you are better off staying liquid especially with treasuries paying 5.3%ulitimately it comes down to the rate of return you need for your financial goals.

I find that it's very rare that a lender will actually close at this amount of leverage because they would typically be putting up a much larger amount of funds than the property would be worth at the time.Has anybody actually worked with a lender that did fund based off of the LTARV?

These investors are typically large financial institutions looking for safe, predictable returns, such as pension funds, insurance companies, and banks.Key concepts to understand in economics and finance are risk and reward.

@Lane McdonaldI’m a fan of Roth IRAs and 401ks only putting in the minimum match to get the free company money.

Yeah, while buying subject to can definitely make sense, selling subject to is something I would never recommend unless there are no other options and even then, only to a reputable company with a long track record and good references.

You can do it all in about 2 hours.I did this in the beginning of my property management company and it worked great until we got to around a dozen cabins. 

I own a small cleaning company, plus we do small make-readys.The below is going from cheapest to most expensive.

Purchase price: $204,000,000 Cash invested: $60,000,000I worked for a Hong Kong public company & high-end luxury residential developer and helped to develop a $204 million condo project called "The Graystone" which is in Seattle's First Hill District.What made you interested in investing in this type of deal?