Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get Full Access
Succeed in real estate investing with proven toolkits that have helped thousands of aspiring and existing investors achieve financial freedom.
$0 TODAY
$32.50/month, billed annually after your 7-day trial.
Cancel anytime
Find the right properties and ace your analysis
Market Finder with key investor metrics for all US markets, plus a list of recommended markets.
Deal Finder with investor-focused filters and notifications for new properties
Unlimited access to 9+ rental analysis calculators and rent estimator tools
Off-market deal finding software from Invelo ($638 value)
Supercharge your network
Pro profile badge
Pro exclusive community forums and threads
Build your landlord command center
All-in-one property management software from RentRedi ($240 value)
Portfolio monitoring and accounting from Stessa
Lawyer-approved lease agreement packages for all 50-states ($4,950 value) *annual subscribers only
Shortcut the learning curve
Live Q&A sessions with experts
Webinar replay archive
50% off investing courses ($290 value)
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted almost 11 years ago

Three Reasons Why Real Estate Investors Should Not Fear Deflation

We’ve been told to fear deflation. The government, the Federal Reserve, the mainstream media, and the mainstream economists are all in agreement. They are all alarmed that deflation would ruin our lives. Such myth has been alive since the Great Depression when Keynesian Economics have become the status quo. But buyer beware. Such myth could be just a fallacy.

My short article is not meant to describe the overall impact of deflation on the economy. I’d leave that for the true free market economists (Austrian economists). My goal is to describe important aspects of how the long term real estate investor would be impacted by such an event. It is not an answer to all possible effects but to the most common ones.

In a deflationary event prices drop which may cause rents to drop, as well. This may cause concern with the investor but such concern should be directed by the net cash flow instead of the gross generated income. When real estate prices drop the assessed value on which property taxes are computed drop, albeit not right away. In a healthy deflationary trend, when there is no central bank money inflation policy intervention and no government regulations/restrictions in the insurance sector, the cost of hazard insurance will also drop. The majority of the rest of other expenses associated with the ownership and management will also be adjusted down with time. What truly matters to the investor is what his profits are.

When his profits in a deflationary climate are maintained at the very minimum to what they were prior to deflation, the investor is in stronger position because his standard of living goes up. To give you an example, if the investor’s net monthly cash flow is maintained at $5,000 before and after deflation, his $5,000 can now during/after deflation buy more goods and services. In other words, his daily cup of coffee will cost him less, his wife’s grocery goods will cost less, he’ll pay less to fill up his vehicles’ gas tank, etc. He can now save more money and if he chooses to purchase more real estate he can do so at a lower price.

It could very well happen that an investor’s profits could not be maintained during the deflation. The $5000 monthly net cash flow goes down to $4,500. While this may cause anticipated concern, the investor will soon realize that his personal cost of living will go down thus his lifestyle won’t be negatively impacted by a lower cash flow from the property.

All of the above explanations apply ceteris paribus. One factor associated with real estate deflation is people loosing their homes. The foreclosure process and the foreclosed homeowners’ inability to immediately purchase another home lowers the real estate investor’s risk of vacancy. The foreclosed folks would have to either move in with relatives or rent a home/apartment. The banks’ foreclosure and resale process is lengthy. Both events are likely to create a shortage of available rentals. Shortages, when demand stays constant or goes up, are associated with price increases. This is what happened in 2008 after the real estate bubble burst. While we may not have experienced a true deflationary economy (due to government’s intervention in the insurance sector and the Federal Reserve’s interference by expanding the money supply) real estate investors have benefited through rent increases and high occupancy levels.

What I have described above are reasons to ease the real estate investor’s mind if real estate is to experience another deflationary event. Such theory, based on my interpretation of the Austrian School of Economics, is built on the assumption that the property is owned free and clear. There is one other factor which plays a key role in the investor’s profitability during deflation. The cost of borrowing money, which is detailed enough to be described in another future article.


Comments (14)

  1. Before logging in i saw aan autrian econoist but we are in a keynsian economy.


  2. Carmen, You seem to really know your economics, you know, for a girl ;). I'll give that article a read. Thanks again for your thoughtful feedback.


    1. Dulcey, thank you for your kind words. My attraction to economics started in 2008 when the bubble burst and I could not figure out what the heck happened. Being in the mortgage business I was embarrassed to think I could not understand the boom/bust cycle. So, I started to read and amongst the research I have done I came across a website called mises.org. I started to read a lot of articles and the more I read the more sense it made. It's like a puzzle and I was looking for the pieces. I still am looking for the pieces since I can'r say the puzzle is complete for me. That's what got me started on my path. Also, with me being born and raised in a communist system with a centrally planned economy I had the experience to know that when government takes control of the economy it always fails. I am also a very pro-liberty minded person considering I came from a system where individual freedom was not on the govt. agenda. I bring individual freedom to the discussion because without freedom in the markets/economy there can be no individual liberty. You are so young and already so aware of the current monetary system. That is very impressive as not many young women I meet are as knowledgeable. Keep it up, it's wonderful to have original ideas in a world and time where propaganda is so powerful;-)


  3. Hi Emma, at first sight with all the money printing it would be very easy to think inflation is more likely than deflation. And that is partially correct. The issue is that the natural market forces lead in the direction of deflation. Yes, the market is a force with its own strategy which man/government think he/it can over-rule. As per my understanding of the Austrian school of Economics during the periods of boom (think 2002-2007) as a result of artificially (think Greenspan) suppressed low rates, there are many malinvestments. Austrians refer to malinvestments as those business ventures and investments that under normal circumstances would have not engaged in such activities, normal circumstances meaning rates would be at their natural levels instead of being manipulated by the central bank (via money and credit expansion). A little pause here to emphasize that most people are not aware that when credit/money supply expand, rates are suppressed, thus kept low. When it contracts, the rates go high (think Paul Volcker, the Fed's chairman at that time in late 1970's and early 1980'2 when rates went through the roof). The Fed is between a rock and a hard place. It recognizes that it cannot go to infinite with the money printing because it would destroy the currency. That's why, several times in this past year Bernanke came out saying the Fed will consider tapering. Of course, each time he says it, the stock market reacts in volatile ways. Which means it causes fear to investors (who are still in the antiquated Keynesian mode of thinking that adding more money to the economy would lead to recovery). I believe the Fed wants to stop the money printing but Wall Street panics, thus the Fed reacts and it becomes a vicious cycle. Well, something has to happen, otherwise the currency could destruct. Even a tiny rise in the rates would cause malinvestments to go bankrupt. Today, we have malinvestments from the 2002-2007 boom and newly created ones after all the QE's, government subsidies, and bailouts. Real estate has re-inflated, the govt. bond market is a big bubble, the student loan market is in a bubble, and the equities market is artificially inflated. All these markets are leveraged, which means that a slight rise in the rates would cause many to...deflate. Not to forget the banks which have very high leverage ratios and are not healthy. Their assets currently include loans which at this time are performing but when the rates rise it would cause malinvestments to fail. Many performing loans will turn into non-performing loans. The banks stand an increase of risk from an already high leverage of 50-70% all the way to possibly 90%, 100%, or even more. My conclusion is that before inflation could set in, deflation would occur in the now artificially inflated sectors of the economy. I hope this helps.


    1. Hi Dulcey, thank you for your thoughts. I just answered Emma's question and the more I think about how the 1930's Great Depression events unfold the more I am leaning towards Deflation before Inflation. The Great Depression lasted for more then 10 years because of the same reason we are still in an economic turmoil today, five years after the banking system collapsed. Unlike the 1921 Depression, when the Fed didn't print money and the economy recovered in less than 2 years. Here is a good article on it. https://mises.org/daily/3788 We can have several sectors of the economy deflating while the commodities market inflating, meaning food would continue its price rising trend. Of course, other factors could impact if commodities could go up in price. Scarcity is one of them. I could write an article about how I think demand/supply factors, government laws and taxation, minimum wage, protectionism, etc. would impact commodities. But this is just the way I think based on what I learned and careful assessment on the topic. Thanks again, it's great to discuss economics with smart female brains.


  4. Carmen, Thanks for your thoughtful response. You are correct, my statement about the banks and government having complete control was a bit of a broad sweeping generalization. The "bursting of the housing bubble" in 2007 did indeed show us that the fed couldn't fix the banks choices to loan $ irresponsibly. I have to agree with Emma in that we are at much bigger risk and likelihood for inflation, we feel it every time we purchase something. The rate of inflation is what could have some serious effects, time will tell how well the fed and govt. can control the rate. I look forward to your next post!


  5. Hi Carmen, Great insight at REI thru macroeconomic analysis. Question: Why is deflation a concern at this point in time? With all the $ the Fed is pumping into the economy, isn't there a higher likelihood of inflation rather than deflation? Or does this question requires it's own post?


  6. Yes, it is nice to have this conversation with women, for a change. Its usually the opposite.


    1. Hi Lisa, I couldn't agree with you more;-)


  7. Hi Dulcey, and thanks for your comments. I agree with you on the subject of ownership with leverage, that's why I made sure my article stated that it would apply to ownership without leverage. As far as a full blown deflation, you are again correct, and I thought I stated the same thing in my article being aware of how the Fed and the govt are fighting deflation via money printing. But where I may respectfully disagree with you, is in the idea that the govt and banks have complete control of the deflation/inflation. Here is why. Yes, the federal reserve and the govt have complete control of the monetary policy, but the fact that banks have an incredibly high leverage ratios (much higher than in any other economic sector) puts them at high risk. This is what happened in 2007 when Lehman Brother was the first bank which started the avalanche of bank failures. This was clear evidence the Fed nor the govt were able to stop the deflation of the real estate market. As much as Bernanke fought it the R.E. prices tumbled. A full blown economic deflation did not occur indeed due to the QE's that didn't allow for a full economic market correction. But real estate did experience deflation. But again, real estate is just one of the economic sectors. I did promise in my article I'd write another one which will be geared towards real estate with leverage and how I believe could be affected by deflation. I will post it and then it would be great to see your thoughts;-) I'd like to gather my thoughts on this because there are several factors that could affect profitability. Finally, it appears you are knowledgeable with monetary policy and its effect at the macro level. I'm very glad to meet smart ladies who are interested in such topics. Thank you.


  8. Carmen, with the USD deflating it would be harder to pay off a loan because we would be earning less. Rents would go down along with other commodities. I would think that the best place to be in this situation is in a debt free position with properties. In my opinion it is not very likely for full blown deflation to occur. There might be momentary blips; however, the entire arc of power in DC and Wall Street do not want deflation to occur. It's bad for government and it's bad for banks. Since the government and the banks have complete control over money supply, and therefore complete control over inflation/deflation it seems unlikely. I think continued inflation is much more likely. - See more at: http://activerain.com/blogs/dulcey?page=9#sthash.cGIs0Br8.dpuf


  9. Oh yes. The housing prices just are not sustainable to the coming next 2 decades: Wage Stagnation, Cost of Living Inflation...Prices will be going down, down, down.


  10. Lisa, thanks for your comments. I am convinced that the current market forces are leading in the deflation mode but a full blown deflation may not happen due to the central bank's intervention.


  11. Deflation in my book equals more cashflow. REI is good when the economy is up, and good when the economy is down.