Skip to content

Posted about 10 years ago

Not All Deals Go According To Plans

Not all deals go perfectly well. One of the advantages of working with a private lender is that they may be much more flexible when something unexpected happens. If the lender has some experience as an investor they may be able to help you work through a difficult situation. I did say MAY. If you ignore my inquiries or don’t take my inquiries seriously and then you miss a payment deadline I can and will declare your loan in default. I don’t really want to but I will hire lawyers if necessary. I think there are generally more beneficial solutions to a business arrangement than using the courts. On the other hand, I am a landlord and though I rarely want to go to court to evict a tenant (ok, I have had a couple tenants that I was happy to evict) I will do so if they don’t pay the rent.

This was a deal I was reluctant to do in the first place. That’s understating it a bit. I knew I wanted nothing to do with this. It was presented by a guy I met at a REIA. (Have I mentioned how important REIA’s can be?) We had spoken a few times and I knew he was an active investor. We had gone out a few days prior (this was the first time we had met outside of a REIA) and he mentioned that he had a potential deal but at that point he wasn’t sure it would develop. This was different than his usual model, which was rehab and flip, because this one was very nice and needed no rehab. I didn’t really believe it. I listened, to be polite, and told him to call me if it happened. A few days later I got the call. He wanted a 3 month note to fund the purchase and resale of a home in Detroit. I know there are Detroit bashers on this site but Detroit has many nice neighborhoods and this is in one of them. The problem is that I am not very familiar with Detroit and there are also a lot of bad neighborhoods. Before this, all my deals with single family homes had been in the Southeast Michigan suburbs. I absolutely did not want to be a landlord in Detroit. I know people that do quite nicely renting homes in the City but it is a different model than what I am familiar with and there are aspects of being an urban landlord that I wanted no part of. One of my possible exit strategies was missing. He needed the funds the next day so I had little time to decide. I didn’t see that as a problem because I was sure I was going to say no.

What changed my mind? Three things.

1. This house really needed no rehab. It was beautiful. It had white carpets and the investor didn't even plan to vacuum them--it really wasn't necessary. The investor had a large database of international investors who were looking to buy investment property in Detroit, many of whom had bought multiple homes from him before. (It can be very profitable if it is done correctly). He was sure this one would sell quickly. So was I. As much as I did not want to be an urban landlord it was hard for me to not buy this one myself.

2. He offered extremely lucrative terms. 10 points up front, folded into the loan, and 15% per annum. 18% if it went into default. On a 3 month note this was phenomenal but also an indication that I had better be careful. Yield is most definitely an indication of risk.

3.The clincher was that he already had a set of loan documents. He sent them over promptly and I had never seen a set of documents that were so one sided—in my favor. Frankly, I thought some of the terms were onerous. I would never propose a contract like this. I told him he could remove some of these clauses and he refused. If I decide to do a deal with someone and they send me a document with a dozen weasel clauses, escape clauses, that let them off the hook if they don’t perform I am not going to fund. There was none of that in this contract. If he defaulted the house was mine—not that I wanted it.

So we did the deal. What went wrong? The deal approached the end of the term and there was no communication. I knew the buyer had been identified but I did not know if a closing date had been scheduled.I waited…until day 93… on a 90 day note. When I reached the borrower he started talking about how busy he had been (he had several projects going on simultaneously, so did I) and he shared some problems he was having with some of them. I asked him if he knew what date it was and he got a bit quieter. He knew the term of the note was expiring but did not know it had already passed. I asked him what happens next and he said that I can take the house. That was the right answer. Now we could talk. It turns out the buyer, who was in Australia, was critically ill. You can’t anticipate everything. We worked out another plan, assuming this buyer would not be able to perform, but to our surprise the illness made him even more determined to complete this deal and motivated him to do several others. The deal went 2 months long but communication between my partner and I was no longer a problem. I was paid handsomely when the deal closed. More importantly, I learned a great deal about my partner (and he of me). We quickly became friends. I have funded five deals for him since that one.



Comments (2)

  1. Wouldn't it always be the case that if the person defaulted, the house would be yours? Or are there other types of clauses that would protect you? Ultimately I think you would want money versus a house but in the end, something over nothing.


    1. Most of my defaults have ended in loan modifications and eventual repayment. If a borrower defaults and cannot or refuses to pay I would eventually take possession of the house. A borrower can make that difficult and expensive to accomplish by making me follow the foreclosure procedures or they can make that easy for me by simply quit claiming the property to me if they are unable to retire the note. I believe the borrower in the example above would have quit claimed the property to me had I asked them to do so.