Conflicts of Interest with Advisors Recommending Physical Real Estate
When an advisor recommends holding physical real estate inside an IRA, there are several possible conflicts of interest that investors should be aware of:
- Custodian and Administrative Fees
- Real estate held in a self-directed IRA requires a specialized custodian.
- These custodians often charge higher annual fees, transaction fees, and property management processing fees.
- An advisor recommending this path may indirectly benefit if they are affiliated with or compensated by the custodian.
- Commission Structures
- Unlike fee-only fiduciary advisors, some advisors or salespeople are compensated through commissions tied to the setup of self-directed IRA accounts or the purchase of specific real estate investments.
- This creates a conflict where the recommendation may be driven by compensation rather than client benefit.
- Product Placement Incentives
- Some real estate promoters package properties specifically for IRA investors. Advisors associated with these programs may earn referral fees, marketing allowances, or other incentives that influence their advice.
- Complexity as a Barrier
- Physical real estate in an IRA is complicated. If an advisor downplays the risks—such as prohibited transactions, UBIT exposure, or liquidity problems—they may be prioritizing a transaction over your best interest.
- Diversification Concerns
- Advisors recommending a large, illiquid real estate investment inside an IRA may knowingly allow a client’s portfolio to become concentrated in a single asset class. That can undermine the retirement account’s role as a diversified savings vehicle.
The Fiduciary Standard Matters
Fee-only fiduciary advisors are legally obligated to put clients’ interests first. That means disclosing potential conflicts, explaining the risks clearly, and showing how a recommendation aligns with the client’s goals.
If an advisor suggests holding physical real estate in your IRA, it’s worth asking:
- How are you compensated for this recommendation?
- Are there alternatives that achieve my goals with fewer restrictions or risks?
- What are the ongoing costs of administration, and who benefits from them?
By understanding these conflicts of interest, investors can better evaluate whether the recommendation serves their retirement goals—or someone else’s bottom line.
Disclosure: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, legal, or tax advice. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. Investment decisions should be based on individual circumstances, and we recommend consulting a qualified professional before implementing any financial, legal, or tax strategies. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and all investments carry risks, including potential loss of principal. No investment strategy can guarantee success or protect against loss in all market conditions. Investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance, investment objectives, and financial circumstances before making investment decisions.
Comments