Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.

Posted over 8 years ago

Voiding a 1031 Exchange by Violating the Related Party Rule

The end of 2016 saw an interesting case come out of U.S. Tax Court. It had to do with an attempted #1031 exchange that violated a very important provision of the code – the prohibition against related parties engaging in an exchange together.

While related parties may conduct exchanges together, the IRS requires that both parties must hold the property they receive at least two years. Failing to do so triggers immediate recognition of any gain. The single exception to this rule occurs if a taxpayer can convince the IRS that the exchange’s principal purpose was not tax avoidance.

This is easier said than done.

To read the details of the Malulani Group case and the reasoning given by the Tax Court for denying the requested 1031 exchange, click here.

If you’re considering a 1031 exchange, please visit our website to learn more about the exchange process, our qualified intermediary services and how we can help you find and close on your next 1031 exchange property.



Comments