After talking with people, my ear gets filled with justifications.From a black and white perspective, it's unlawful, licenses get revoked, and judgments are served.

Unlawful enemy combatants would not be kept at GITMO, they would simply be executed (as per the Geneva Convention)6.

(f) Rent skimming is unlawful, and any waiver of the provisions of this section are void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy.

Here is the rub, which is another unlawful, unethical, policy followed by lenders, (where's that *** **** watchdog..toothless, blind in one eye, sleeping under the porch but at least the somnabich- could come out and growl, just once in awhile) In California the lenders have until 4 years from the date you made your last payment to file suit and sue you for their losses in these cases according to Mortgage resolution Trust, one of the big players out here.

Have your attorney do two things simultaneously: (1) draft a letter to the tenant called "notice of termination and demand to vacate" and (2) file an unlawful detainer suit seeking possession and, if possible, damages. 

Clearly the courts have ruled "interior" inspections unconstitutional (violates unlawful search and seizure restrictions), so I won't argue that. 

In any unlawful detainer case filed under § 8.01-126, if a judge grants the plaintiff a judgment for possession of the premises, upon request of the plaintiff, the judge shall further order that the writ issue immediately upon entry of judgment for possession.

The portion of Rule 6(a) regarding the computation of time when the period prescribed or allowed is less than eleven (11) days does not apply to any time periods prescribed or allowed by statute or these rules in unlawful-detainer or eviction actions.

That is the starting point, what the tenant agrees to with regard to these things as long as they are not unlawful is where to begin. 

If they do not pay April's rent, then filing an unlawful detainer to remove them from the premises is the next step.