The people coming up with this stuff are smart enough to know that it’s impossible mathematically.

Create and modify tables, forms, queries, and reports, all from within Apache OpenOffice.Math lets you create mathematical equations with a graphic user interface or by directly typing your formulas into the equation editor.

Great so the way that I am reading this equation PP x CR = NOI is that the NOI must be at least 1.25 of the monthly payment for the investment to begin making sense.Thank you very much for the insight everyone I randomly picked this property for mathematic purposes. 

Voodoo mathematics with Caps vs real Comps is not going to make up the difference. 

You claimed the incorrect amount because of a mathematical error made in any year.You claimed the incorrect amount because of a posting error made in any year.You have not adopted a method of accounting for property placed in service by you in tax years ending after December 29, 2003.You claimed the incorrect amount on property placed in service by you in tax years ending before December 30, 2003.

Attorneys have tried to put the breach of the duty of care into mathematical terms whether any action or inaction was negligent by using the BPL analysis:B=burden (cost)P=probability of lossL=gravity of lossIf the BP>L, then you are likely negligent.

The income approach is more mathematical.

You would need to hire structural engineers to mathematically prove that the area collapse by being overloaded......and prove that that original construction was adequate, designed properly and was not compromised....and that's gonna cost you some decent $$.

Mathematically it's almost always better to borrow if you can invest at a higher rate than you borrow at.  

Calculators are great Jeff, but these on bloomberg or any others do not calculate the interst savings on the format I explained above.You pretty much have to do it by hand to see your savings (obviously must be somewhat mathematically inclined)