It certainly adds up but it will have college FAFSA consequences if the account, IRA etc gets large enough & it's in their name.It's the ONLY form of 'income redistribution' I agree with :)

The profits from the sale are then redistributed with priority given to catching up on any missed preferred distributions. - -✅ Bottom Line: If a sponsor is offering a preferred return, it does not mean you will receive that % every year in distributions.

What if a beneficiary passed away, is that share redistributed to other beneficiaries or passed on to a specific heir of the beneficiary  (e.g. eldest son).  

Mine are working through hs/college with the expectation that they pay for their own education, cars, homes, etc. but they're going to get what I don't spend (and the government doesn't "fairly redistribute" for me). 

The ultra rich and powerful would lose their wealth as it get redistributed. 

Which could potentially be managed by bringing in crops from other states, redistributing supply chains if you will.It’s possible that desalination is a viable option, but my understanding is that, that technology still has some less than desirable environmental impacts (I could be wrong).

And ever ask why these big corporations are all for "redistribution" tactic's and social enterprise?

I think the issue would be the ownership structure in relation to passing something on - if someone who owns the property dies, is it inherited by their multiple children and then you have to navigate all of their schedules and desires, or is it owned in joint tenancy -- if you happen to die before you sell your shares you are just unlucky because the ownership is redistributed to the other owners and not passed onto heirs?

@Animesh Das @Mike MollicaAs others have said, whenever you have equity in a property that you're thinking about redistributing elsewhere, you have to analyze the potential ROI of each option and decide if your money would be better invested elsewhere.First, you have to start with your goals... what's the long-term plan? 

I argued that government-mandated land redistribution, transfer to the US Dollar instead of local currency for exchanges of goods and services, and economic re-liberalization (I added an extra "re" in the essay for some reason) didn't cut it to explain what happened.