Look at sb897. 1) bill states that the construction of an ADU on a property does not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers in the proposed or existing primary dwelling.There is another ADU law (forget which one) that basically states an ADU Cannot be rejected due to existing unrelated permit issues on items that are not the ADU.So I see no reason an inspector should ask or be given permission to examine the interior or unrelated units.Good luck

Quote from @Henry T.: Don't be a landlord in Seattle.  

RIDICULOUS.https://community.stessa.com/t/unable-to-get-money-out-of-st...https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/oakland/profile/associations/stess...Their support is terrible and why hold on to our money??

As @Travis Timmons said, they can be kinda 'clunky'....but you can;t ignore them if you want to have a successful operation.Yes they want your total tax rate.

< LANDLORD’S RIGHT TO SHOW AND INSPECT Landlord and its agents shall have free access to the Premises, at reasonable hours only, with 24 hours notice, for the purpose of examining the Premises to ascertain if same are in good condition and repair, for the purpose of making reasonable repairs which Landlord may be required to make hereunder and for the purpose of exhibiting the Premises to prospective purchasers or tenants.

@Tibor T.

Quote from @James McGovern: The gap between what private money lenders who use their own money vs hard money t he at gets the funding to do deals from the capital markets, the interest and fees seem to be growing further apart. what is behind this trend? 

After being in l/t court dozens of times (as a property manager), I agree with the above responses to your post.  

Originally posted by @Bill T.

A realtor told me they could not sell my share of the land and I would have t on wait for the court process to clean up title.