
12 September 2025 | 30 replies
Haters gonna hate...False.

8 September 2025 | 4 replies
@Vera HendriksI posted this a couple of years ago, hope it helps youThere’s lots of confusion, incorrect information, and false assumptions being made about the legality of raising capital for investment.

8 September 2025 | 101 replies
I've received 2 K1's so if this is fraud then i'd imagine they've committed a federal offence by issuing false documents to the federal authorities.

25 September 2025 | 17 replies
Is Subject to SE Tax: False.

26 August 2025 | 3 replies
Lawyers don't commonly call it "Sub To".It's a variety of foreclosure, subject to, probate, bankruptcy, recorded "memorandums" real estate license revocations, consumer fraud, senior fraud, notary abuse, false filings, deceptive practices.

12 September 2025 | 49 replies
Santarelli as an absolute industry expert (podcast, websites, press, social media advertisement) cause investors to have a false sense of security.

6 September 2025 | 25 replies
And write a bunch of false information to my state attorney general.

1 September 2025 | 7 replies
That was a false promise to get people to join a Subto community at $12,000 each as a "protection" to offer sellers.

26 August 2025 | 31 replies
The idea that you can be a start up investor, be passive, and be rich is false.

17 September 2025 | 37 replies
And then it goes one of two ways - either the borrower (or broker) slinks away with no further comment or they become indigent that it all your fault because you didn’t uncover their fraud “fast” enough; or you he previously produced a term sheet (based on the false information or non disclosure of pertinent facts by them), or you didn’t ask them specifically for the information they with held, or that shouldn’t be a criteria, or you’re discriminating against them, or a million other reasons meaning a affirmative action their “victim” status.