
1 September 2016 | 137 replies
It's no better than giving them sugar pills for half their social security check and justifying it by saying "the power of positive thinking is real".

3 May 2023 | 1572 replies
Even if you have a sugar momma or sugar daddy, we need to run a background check to ensure you are not a danger to the property or other tenants.

15 April 2019 | 60 replies
Some internet providers ban you for going over data quota, and/or for torrents.Jon,Glenn's question was about liability, not consumption.

20 December 2017 | 20 replies
Not much of a sugar coater but you're more than welcome to reach out for more help.

28 June 2020 | 15 replies
How much are the costs of sugar packets, and their associated costs based on the cost of paper packaging in Mexico?

16 February 2020 | 26 replies
(a) There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, mailing lists, if the contract regarding that mailing list restricts the purchaser to a single use of the mailing list.

29 June 2023 | 73 replies
WAY more.....In my opinion the only time you would ever want to accept negative monthly cash flow is when you are 99% sure the appreciation is going to pay off in the long run...and it better appreciate a LOT.....You can sugar coat the situation with the tenant paying down the loan, the write offs and depreciations.... but your goal in retirement was to replace your W2 with rental income.... not rental loss.....In my opinion, time to cut your losses.....it will hurt in the short term but be better in the long term.

19 February 2018 | 31 replies
In this scenario you max out your 10 loan limit and they can also do the same allowing you to increase the amount of consumption to 20 loans.
19 March 2013 | 19 replies
No matter how much you sugar coat your reasoning for selling in high volume without a license; before a Wisconsin court of law, or any other states adopting similar statues, codes, articles, chapters, etc. its distinctly evident that you, or your LLC if you operate through one, display a pattern of sales that coincides with what the law expresses as being illegal without a license.