27 August 2025 | 43 replies
A law degree does not mean you know anything re wraps.If worse comes to worse, you can stop the foreclosure with legal action - it costs some but you will not lose your equity.I would not throw the baby out with the bath water re doing wraps and I do hope all works out for you.Reach out if you need a referral to a good AZ attorney to helpBe careful out there guysAlan Not to be too blunt, but you are handing bullets to a six year old with a gun.

12 August 2025 | 11 replies
Hair on fire.. record my own deeds courier the reinstatement check to the Trustees office day before the sale or morning literally hour before the sale. this I found is when folks finally get over denial and can take action 72 hours before the sale.. and of course i had a great title company that would do a date down on the phone but we still took some title risk..

15 August 2025 | 9 replies
I know it sounds like I'm splitting hairs but some banks write HELOCs in their residential department....which won't write Investment Properties.

7 August 2025 | 3 replies
.: Doesn't toe-touch also have problems with hair clogs?

10 August 2025 | 7 replies
Welcome and congratulations on your upcoming baby!

6 September 2025 | 54 replies
I also felt it was extremely click bait - "Look at this baby who has 1000 rentals and achieved FIRE in just 3 weeks!!

17 September 2025 | 27 replies
But I could start selling off 1 by 1 -- but that ruins my chances I feel to 1031 this baby into a Detroit apartment building lol As for risk adverse -- I have an extremely high risk tolerance.

11 August 2025 | 29 replies
On clean, fast hard money deals with a decent size (like $500k), maybe 50bps might fly. 100 bps is more realistic, especially at lower loan amounts or if there is a lot of hair on it that soaks up time and bandwidth.

5 August 2025 | 8 replies
I have guests bring their dogs into my showers and leave drains full of dog hair, just as an example.

17 September 2025 | 41 replies
It was never on SubTo, just some hair brained scheme ken concocted with LWO's.Which as Ken detailed it, was blatant Theft By Swindle, at least that's what it falls under in MN.