I’ve seen quite a few investors look into working with Rent to Retirement, and while some have had decent experiences, others prefer to have a bit more control and build their own local teams.

@Paul De Luca thank you

Control is the most important factor, followed by leverage (equity multiple) and the ability to purchase below FMV. 

Quiet hours / noise control: Must comply with the county’s noise ordinance (example: exterior noise not continuously above specified decibel limits). 

On one end, you have sponsors who attract institutional capital, family offices, private equity, or high–net-worth investors where the LP's often negotiate stronger terms and maintain greater control. 

The main upside is getting control of a property with little upfront cash or traditional financing.

Yes, there is an opportunity for fix and flip, but unless you find the right deal the market prices are out of control.

A developer partner would be expected to bring:- Predevelopment and construction capital- Lender relationships and guarantees- Entitlement / permitting / SB 79 experience- Day-to-day control of the business planQuestions for developers / capital folks who’ve done something similar:1.

, pets stay FREE(0 bookings)Property C - Strict to FLEXIBLE Cancellation, pets stay FREE(11 bookings, 2 inquires)Property D - Control, no changes (STRICT cancellation, no pets)(1 inquiry)ALL properties I made sure "opportunities" where near max (office space with a comfy chair, etc)It's really interesting that I opened up pets to 3 of them, 2 of them I added flexible cancellation and the ones with flexible cancellation SOARED.Had nothing to do with me as a host, or my properties.

Because once you experience a model where appreciation and cash-flow work together instead of against each other, you stop thinking like a landlord and start thinking like the bank.You stop chasing markets and start controlling outcomes.The article says investors should “find the balance.”I say you should build a system where balance is automatic.