They are presenting it as mandatory, when a tenant can simply have renters insurance that they get on their own at a much lower price.

If we really boil it down to the nuts and bolts of it, price (in a normal market) would have likely taken a dip but the real impact will be all the people who are bonused and overcompensated being cut from those companies.

Assuming you can simply walk, you can choose to walk to give you more negotiating time.             

If the ARV less the repairs (plus at least 10% for contingencies) less your desired profit less the closing / sales costs are more than where you can meet, simply walk away. 

The sound & practical advice @Aristotle Kumpis references boils down to venue and choice of law.

I’m always open to sharing ideas, referrals, or simply supporting each other’s growth.Drop a comment or shoot me a DM - let’s keep building

It’s also a provision that many owners either forget or simply don’t know exists.

What if I have to evict  someone that technically lives under the same roof as me... or simply just sending a "Notice to Comply" I feel could create tension.Please let me know if you're someone who has self-managed a house hack and was it worth it?

That said, unless there is a state law prohibiting it, you simply buy the property from the owner and the tax lien gets paid off at the time of the sale.  

They were referrals and the business started to grow simply because I had a competent team that was responsive and looked out for the owners' best interests.