For larger commercial properties the pricing model is different because of scale, I just don't know how exactly that works.

I feel squeezed between big-city operators who seemingly gobble up market share, and a rural operator who's in mass-expansion mode for last several years.  

And, rehabbing out of state using 100% borrowed funds is hard mode.  

Hi Jason,I’m still pretty new to real estate, so I’m in learning mode, but your situation caught my eye.

Use of Public Testimonies: Norada Capital Management uses past, satisfied investors, not audited financials or any evidence that corroborates their business model is a tactic used by all of us who sadly were running Ponzi schemes.10.

As has been noted in various conversations here, my challenge with the capital raiser/FoF model is that many of these groups are not offering any better terms to their LPs than the LPs could achieve on their own, given a lot of the groups the FoF raise for have very low minimums, themselves. 

They work very similarly to a single-family home, of course with different rental rates.The path split model is different than run by the room, which is also very different than renting an entire property as an MTR. 

Currently in analysis, not quite paralysis mode (yet), I haven't gone through the process but here's what I think I know.1. 

Combined with some light rehab and self check in you could do a minimal staffing model.

I would suspect as everyone else has stated, this business model is set up to favor the operator at your expense.