They want to spread the movement nationally:http://rentsandrants.blogspot.com/2015_04_01_archi...Here are some tenants protesting to take away your hard earned investments:This is what they're protesting every day.  

The goal for me, I would like to replace my and my wife’s income (perpetually) so we can both pursue other interests/hobbies and always be there for our children.

FYI - end goals are to have 10k relatively passive income a month - in perpetuity.

It looks like she's transitioned to business reporting on what the Chronicle calls the sharing economy and maker movement.  

But maybe I shouldn’t have said that and instead should just live in a perpetual state of self-loathing because the world is unfair.

They can barely afford to pay their mortgages and taxes there and live in perpetual fear that they'll have to downgrade or move their kids out of the school system they're in, an unthinkable loss of social status.As their kids grow, they unthinkingly strengthen then strong and weaken the weak, culminating in too many avoidable instances of weak, brittle, fearful young people of privilege who are unable to deal with any sort of real adversity and only really do anything when faced with the possibility that inaction might significantly damage their own precious social status, documented daily on Instagram, Facebook, etc.So in my private life of old friends and family, I find myself somewhat hemmed in by incredibly hard-working people who care a great deal about social status and constantly make utterly inane excuses about why they're all so damned broke as they drive massively depreciating cars and live in houses that are dumpster fires of various expenses.

Additionally, here in Cook County, IL the "housing is a right" movement nearly eliminated the effectiveness of background checks.

@Todd Powell it is abundantly clear to me that the various jurisdictions that implemented the eviction moratoriums fueled the fire of the "cancel rent" movement.

I'd like to suggest trading or investing in indexes like the S&P because you never have weird surprise movements like -20% or +20% in a matter of 24 hours, and it's a bit more predictable to me.

@Bryan BealYou said two things that make I agree with whole heartedly " Drunk driving is both irresponsible and ILLEGAL""within the confines of the law"You are in California so this applies to you.California Government Code Chapter 7 California Emergency Services Act- Allows the government to make laws that we are seeing put into effect now during times of emergency IE: wearing face coverings outside, closing parks and beaches, restricting movements and crowded events.