
11 March 2025 | 6 replies
Once they have seen the property and are interested, the prequalification and background checks will do the rest of the work in weeding out undesirable tenants for you.

10 March 2025 | 10 replies
Which is why it’s generally better to own fewer but better properties in areas that are desirable VS owning many “affordable” (undesirable) crapboxes in the Midwest.

8 March 2025 | 4 replies
City proper, peripheral neighborhoods or metropolitan area?

25 February 2025 | 20 replies
It is the perfect home for me (as an airbnb) but it's undesirable to a regular person since it's dated (its a late 1960's home).

24 February 2025 | 37 replies
The goal is to make money, not to see how many cheap (undesirable) money losing properties you can own.

15 February 2025 | 7 replies
You already decrease that ability by buying property in undesirable locations.

15 February 2025 | 14 replies
An algorithm will probably tell you that undesirable property is an amazing "value add" opportunity.

9 February 2025 | 3 replies
Do you already have some kind of pre-screening questionnaire setup to weed out undesirable tenants?

7 February 2025 | 40 replies
Many of us feel that Safeguard misrepresented investment opportunities in undesirable areas.

5 February 2025 | 5 replies
Maintenance/cap ex, insurance, if a rental PM, bookkeeping, misc.The fact you have a loan means 1) leverage 2) equity pay down.In addition, there are tax benefits.So I will do some rough underwriting as an OO non-rental at 95% LTV (because FHA has some undesired consequences that make the 1.5% difference in LTV worth avoiding the FHA).equity paydown: 20% (using OP interest rate at 95% LTV and not counting closing costs).