29 October 2025 | 31 replies
But if you're using traditional financing, you'll usually need at least 10-20% skin in the game.Bottom line—BRRRR is a powerful strategy when done right, but it’s not passive.
13 October 2025 | 1 reply
Fix it fast: lead with a crisp one‑pager showing deal, numbers, security, and payback; put some of your own skin in; state risks and how you mitigate; then give consistent updates.
23 October 2025 | 24 replies
(And there's fear of retaliation in reality.)STR management is not for the thin-skinned.
26 November 2025 | 68 replies
The most immediate take-away from this site for me when I first started posting on here was needing to develop thicker skin.
13 October 2025 | 4 replies
100%, "no skin in the game"?
15 October 2025 | 4 replies
In other words 80% conventional loans, as ALMOST all loans, require the borrower to have skin in the game.
14 October 2025 | 8 replies
Sometimes you just have to think, would I trust someone with $500k with no skin in the game or history to show that they will repay me?
17 October 2025 | 4 replies
The company's leadership must have "skin in the game."
9 October 2025 | 6 replies
@Erik Roth - Your point on a lender justifiably wanting the borrower to have decent credit and some skin-in-the-game is valid - and nothing in my comment suggested otherwise.
21 October 2025 | 56 replies
One other note, in my opinion the best indication of returns for this kind of asset is IRR.