who advised that their credit was pulled earlier this month (on the 2nd), implying that I won't to worry about pulling credit.I didn't get into this "credit pulled already" issue cause I had to say they will not qualify based on credit alone (she told me the score is 500).But anyway, my gut feeling is - they apply a lot and get rejected a lot and are trying to save on application fee.

The possibility of a leak, however, gets into installer qualifications and methods which I think as investors we do have degree of control over.My opinion on the permit question is to use business considerations to gauge risk of going whatever direction one goes, and to do your best to make sure you have a qualified installer.My post was made following the post by the OP @Bienes Raices where it was stated the hot water heater in question was electric, implying that it was not vulnerable to explosion of the sort that a gas leak would produce.

I've also approached tenants who are nearing their window and if they imply they might not renew, offer them a small discount to extend for 2-3 months depending on m lifestyle needs.

Secondly, p2p is know to you otherwise you are introduced and now you have a brokerage relationship even if implied.

I am not an attorney, however, I believe all states have implied rules that any contract is assignable unless noted otherwise and if it is, it is not illegal, just not allowed per the contract by the seller.If you are mixing up wholesaling with "assigning" than that is one thing, but "assigning" a contract can not be made to be illegal as far as I know.

I think you may have misunderstood me.I did not mean to imply the landlord cannot enter the unit if the tenant does not allow it.

So what does the irs mean by saying that a prohibited transaction is:“Receiving unreasonable compensation for managing itâ€This does imply that receiving a ressonable fee is legal.

She's very successful, very honest, well respected, and a great trainer.

When I read your earlier post it sounded very much like you were implying that the official position of the IRS was a preference for an EA over other tax professionals.

I want to do that legally, ethically and in such a way that it provides some measure of security for my existing company while providing some financial incentives and a level of security for other partners to join.Again, I am NOT trying to do things the wrong way (as you seem to imply).