Subject to deals are definitely a fascinating area of real estate financing.

I am currently a middle school science teacher, and although I find it to be extremely worthwhile and I get much value out of it, I know that I do not want to be teaching for the remainder of my working years. 

It's always fascinating to me to hear people's reasoning.Often times it's easy to fall into the SFH $100 cash flow per month trap.

US citizens won't tolerate it  They already proved they aren't the most compliant people on the face of planet Earth, even when "the science says." 

This has been a fascinating thread and thank you to everyone who gave input on the legality of this and shedding some light on RCW 61.34.Sometimes when you see a law or read the reasoning you are left scratching your head, for example, RCW61.34.020 (3)a "Distressed home consultant" means a person who: Solicits or contacts a distressed homeowner...etcIf we as real estate investors / buyers are not allowed to contact people facing foreclosure... why does the state still make said information public record and free to access????

This is pretty fascinating to me to hear Lethbridge is immune to the cyclical nature of oil and gas.

(I grew up in North Alabama, and we had a science field trip there in middle school once).  

While I love ambiguity in my art and I recognize some of REI is an art-form rather than a science, I am also always looking for ways to increase accuracy in my analyses. 

I think Vallejo's future outlook will largely be driven by the outcome of the contrasting waterfront development and Orcem concrete plant proposalshttp://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/09/28/vallej...https://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/11/21/vallejo-ce...

The vast majority of folks here wouldn't have a clue what you're talking about anyway TA is not an exact science.