9 June 2019 | 192 replies
@Brianne H.It is always a bit of a gamble working with someone new.
7 June 2019 | 8 replies
I don't think you'd lose much money if you gamble with one.
11 October 2020 | 589 replies
I personally don't expect it to be because students can't gamble with not having housing for an entire semester/year from Fall 2020 - Spring 2021.
18 June 2019 | 14 replies
For example anything that looks like spam is, so just don't answer.
16 February 2020 | 247 replies
Detroit and nobody has heard from her since, haha.nope, she's back and spamming again
18 December 2019 | 11 replies
Therefore, I am uncertain as to how much I can profit, and therefore, I am on hold.I would say that if you already had Portfolio of buildings like mine which had properties acquired decades ago and had already captured a large amount of Appreciation where the Price may move down a bit, then it's worth keeping for the Gamble that the future politics may not touch 2 to 4 Family Buildings.So for me personally, I am keeping the portfolio but am not expanding it.What I will expand, however, is my Property Management business should the future regulate my buildings!
17 March 2022 | 2 replies
Don't take it personally about the word 'Spam'.
4 August 2020 | 177 replies
A lot of RE investors piled on debt without cashflow to suffice the debt obligation in order to bet on huge appreciation, which is gambling.
30 October 2020 | 43 replies
Maybe Seattle will appreciate more, maybe it'll slow down or even go backwards for awhile, but if you're not cash flowing in the meantime it sounds like that's a gamble that's more trouble than it's likely worth.
15 April 2017 | 15 replies
Solid deal, but was a good price since it was sight unseen re: the inside and thus a bit of a gamble.