You can review with your attorney to see if fraudulent representation should be one of the claims in your lawsuit, if it isn't already.If it is a claim already, then the judge or jury will decide.It's still not clear what the actual damage or harm was that resulted from not having a listing agreement. 

It tries to paint skepticism as sexism, when in fact, the skepticism might be rooted in protecting others from harm. 

That is a good idea to not harm your credit, and it sounds much more efficient.

If not, no harm done—you can explore other options.If you have any questions or need advice as you go through this, feel free to message me anytime.

If the cash flow going into the CLO drops from $100 a month to $90 a month, it’s really the junior/equity tranches who get harmed first.

Next (if it has not already happened), leaks could begin and harmful water pollution.

Again, you can find attorneys to help  with the paperwork but expect good attorneys to at least advise you of the risks but most will shy away from this type of representation because of the harm that can be done.

It will build your case against the other side's fraud or harm.

If you fight it in escrow the HML is going to want their points and interest whereas if it does not close then no harm no foul.

But it our responsibilities as trusted professionals to guide them away from harm and loss.In the last few years I have had people call me to find a qualified intermediary for all sorts of frivolous reasons including because they don't want to pay the tax on $1100 of long term capital gain.