The benefits of non-recourse loans are fairly self evident.

I have done everything within legal bounds correctly and have all the evidence to defend the deductions. 

Of course they sell an 'installed product' so it is not readily evident, but I want everyone to make money so they're around for the next job and the next....I see no point in being so tight with every dollar, it serves no one's best interests...not even the investor who is trying to pinch every penny.

If this is the case, and you are still trying to cut her out, then it's evident that you're trying to get a discounted deal. 

There is no presented evidence that suggests the buyer can buy the house.But we're going to counter with an offer so aggressive that (we suspect) there is no way the buyer can agree to.

This means they must provide credible evidence to support their claims and comply with all substantiation and record-keeping requirements mandated by the tax code.Despite the taxpayers' testimony that the RV served as a boat sales office and provided nighttime security, they failed to produce any records or documentation to substantiate these claims.

Hey there,Kudos on investing time and effort in learning about real estate—it's evident you've done your homework.

Quote from @Hares Najand: We could dig into the nuances of all your issues, but I think it's simpler to just answer one question: do you have evidence they are cheating your or failing to protect you as their client?

I've had plenty of agents want to argue with me about a low appraisal and only a handful even try to do the work to provide actual evidence of why the appraised value is incorrect; you usually get a bunch of bellyaching and complaining but not much evidence to justify a value increase. 

However, If you are advising others of this equity drop, maybe you should present your case or evidence as to where your theory comes from.