It would need to be a spectacular property most likely, not a tiny home.

@Isi Nau@Jay HinrichsI certainly didn't expect there to be much posting in this thread.The majority of BP Investors that NEED cash flow because they can't afford to invest for Appreciation bias their minds to the stable and higher return of Appreciating Markets.I recently posted about one of my properties that Returned 160% per year ROI for 17 years to demonstrate that if you used your intellect and take into account Future Value, implying calculating Appreciation Rates and future economics, you can take advantage of it and make spectacular results.Why the prices of these assets are too high for the average Investor alone, Partnering becomes the skill needed to Invest in those markets.Instead of having a good conversation about it, postings about taking Appreciation into Account (or as I like to say, taking Future Value calculations into Account), which implies knowing your future economics, is non-existent.INSTEAD, most of the posts will boil down to a calculation on Cash Flow NOW, which is the 1st Year Cash Flow.

In Wa it has been spectacular. 

The Bay Minette area is also a good area to focus for LTR, but also any of the more rural areas north of the coastline. 

With our five rentals at the time, common sense who tell you if I can cash flow at 12.5%, we'll do spectacular at 7.5%.

Spectacular market!

being urged to "become a private lender," and i think this is spectacularly risky. 

It won’t cash flow as well as other markets but when you factor in the growing population and rapid appreciation, the IRR in Tampa can be spectacular. 

Update: They eventually provided the financial information, and it was less than spectacular.

Looking back at the 2008 recession, as Canadians buying properties in markets like Dallas or Pheonix in the 2009/2010 timeframe with a near parity dollar, would have been spectacular.