
13 February 2012 | 4 replies
What I have a problem with is people representing something they are not in the deal and misleading all the parties involved.

16 February 2012 | 11 replies
So, you shouldn't be fighting with an agent at all, only their broker (and you probably shouldn't be fighting with the broker either).Second, you only pay a commission if the deal is closed (there are some edge cases where you'd technically owe a commission on a deal that's not consummated, but those would involve you not living up to an executed agreement, which you never had with the buyer the first time around).Third, if an agent/broker has an issue with a buyer breaching an agency relationship, that is between the broker and the buyer, not the seller.

11 July 2012 | 12 replies
I would bet this building has 15,000 square feet of hard to utilize area -- warehouse space in primary retail area, second floor area, back lot, etc.
14 February 2012 | 11 replies
Id bet you money this isnt going to happen and is a waste of your time.

26 February 2012 | 5 replies
And knowing prices in many other areas, I don't think this is unreasonable in many parts of the country.But again, it's going to differ based on several factors and getting several bids is the best bet...

30 April 2013 | 12 replies
That appears to be paying cash, so there is no debt service involved here.

13 February 2012 | 10 replies
A few title companies mentioned that they didn't want to get involved in these transactions and risk going to jail.

1 April 2012 | 28 replies
Im guessing he should be involved in every step of the way, huh?

16 February 2012 | 8 replies
Or like the others said it may be wiser and safer to involve the authorities for this one....Either way let us know how it turns out Joel....Godd luck,Chris