My gut feeling is this will ultimately sell for something much more than $500k with contract language that makes it more favorable to the Seller.

If I purchased a SFH and added a roommate at the median rent, the numbers should largely be in my favor just for the sacrifice of adding a housemate.

We're itching to pull out cash to deploy in a second acquisition, but the reviews on joint loans don't seem particularly favorable.

If a very low interest rate and favorable amortization period is assumed in the provider's calculations, ask which lending institution offers the favorable terms and contact them to prequalify. 

Electric baseboard is very expensive to run so I would not favor that.

What I meant to say is that it's unethical for a realtor to give first dibs to their investor on a property that hasn't hit the MLS and then go on to purposefully avoid telling the seller that they can likely get the same favorable terms from other investors if it hit the market.

I cannot comprehend a lot of the things in the builder's contract, which seems to favor them in pretty much all of the situations.

The numbers may not be as favorable with PMI, but you get the same experience with much less cash needed out of pocket and can cut down on your housing expenses.

You may find some very favorable rental opportunities and landlords willing to adjust due to covid.

You cannot avoid deduction to make numbers more favorable to lenders.