Guaranteed restoration is far more expensive so your market needs to support that decision.

Call and ask how you can re-petition and provide leases supporting the amount.

IMO, saying I need to find a lender, my deal will support me paying 12% for one year, is more to finding a lender, not an investor.If I wanted a partner, I'd briefly describe what I do, I'm a successful contractor expending into buying rehabs in the Kalamazoo area that is a blah, blah.

Here is my supporting example: if the loan is secured by a non-owner occupied property and the money is used for a family, personal or household purpose (family vacation for example) it is covered by SAFE, conversely, if the loan is secured by a owner occupied property and the money is used for other than family, personal or household use (fix and flip rehab for example) it is not covered by SAFE.

To me that would be about supporting a community, but that is me speaking personally not financially, this is your personal choice.

I think we all want that, so I'm ready to support the effort as long as it doesn't dent my pocket even more.My buck stops at Roger Campagnolo, so I'd rather see you focus your sarcastic crapstorm on that jack-hole than BO, but it's your dime.I was surprised to not hear S.A. on the call...I hope he's still fired up...

It has never been necessary because we are a community of mutual support and contribute here out of choice.

If you through enough **** against the wall over a long enough time period your bound to get something to stick.To be honest I thought this would be an interesting topic, one can go into very calculated economic & social influences to support or reject the idea or one can propose it with conspiracy theories regarding socialist oligarchies.

The only asset class he supports is productive farming land.

The rest of unincorporated Dekalb is largely residential and lacks the commercial tax base necessary to support their ridiculous idea.