Consider using an addendum to address these issues.Tenant acknowledges and agrees that (1) tenant assumes responsibility and liability for any injuries or damages that may occur resulting from or caused by the furniture or the use thereof; (2) Landlord shall not be liable for any damage or injury to persons or property caused, directly or consequentially, by the furniture or use or misuse thereof; (3) tenant assumes the risk of injury or damage by any unknown furniture conditions; (4) Tenant shall properly warn any persons on the premises of any actual or potential dangers relating to the furniture; (5) no person other than the tenants and authorized occupants and guests may use the furniture; (6) the furniture may not be transferred, leased, or sold and shall remain in the premises; (7) the permissive use of the furniture is not a right granted to the tenant and may be revoked or altered at any time by Landlord; (8) Tenant shall immediately notify Landlord in writing of any actual or suspected dangerous conditions that exist or may develop as a result of the use or misuse of the furniture; (9) tenant shall not use any furniture, nor allow the same to be used, in a manner not intended by the manufacturer and in a safe manner; (10) Landlord shall not be obligated to provide, maintain or supply any other furniture to the tenant; (11) tenant shall not make any modifications or alterations to the furniture; (12) tenant shall hold Landlord harmless and indemnify the Landlord for any injuries or damages suffered to tenant, his or her guests, family, invitees, occupants and any other person present with or without the permission of the tenant, arising out of the use or misuse of the furniture;(13) tenant shall properly keep and maintain the furniture and is responsible for any damage caused to the same, including but not limited to removing stains, cleaning, and repairing; and (14) if the Landlord sells the property, Landlord has the right to remove all furniture upon and in anticipation of closing of the property.

You can always purchase a mid-range unit and note in the lease that tenants are responsible for misuse/damage. 

But let's not confuse misuse with the tool itself being "very bad advice." 

(I won't get started on how Furnished Finder is often misunderstood, and people don't have success with it because they are misusing it.)

However, Resident shall be obligated for the costs of such repairs, replacements, and related services if the need for such repairs, replacements, and related services results from the negligence or misuse by Resident, other residents of the Property, or Resident’s agents, servants, employees, invitees, or family members, or if the repair is less than One-Hundred Dollars ($100.00).

Both were controlled by Weinstein, though Newbery did not realize they were shell entities.Disputes and EvidenceAHP underperformed in collecting on the SCLCs and claimed Oak Harbor failed to transfer or cooperate properly.Weinstein accused AHP of misusing recovered funds, but the court found no proof of wrongdoing.Weinstein later attempted to take back certain SCLCs unilaterally, which AHP viewed as a breach of trust.In December 2023, Oak Harbor sued to enforce payment on the note.In December 2024, AHP formally exercised its “Put Remedy” within the allowed 24-month window, returning the uncollected claims.Court’s Legal ConclusionsIntegrated Contracts: The Promissory Note and Purchase Agreement were one unified deal and must be interpreted together.No Breach by AHP:The “waterfall” payment structure required that AHP first recover its servicing fees ($100,000 per year) and costs before paying Oak Harbor.Oak Harbor had collected about $773,000 independently from the same claims but failed to share those proceeds with AHP as the contract required.Because those waterfall priorities were unmet, AHP owed no interest or payments on the note.Put Remedy Properly Exercised:The court held that “unrealized” meant uncollected—not unenforceable—claims.AHP’s December 2024 “put back” was valid and timely.$2 Million Cash Term Unresolved:Both sides intended to settle this with other debt offsets but never finalized the arrangement; hence, there was no enforceable breach.Fraud Defense:AHP showed that Weinstein used nominee companies (Keydally/Pallida) and an uninformed Irish signatory (paid €6,000) to disguise ownership, inflating the sale price.However, the court found AHP failed to prove reasonable reliance or all elements of fraud because Newbery was also a sophisticated businessman who neglected due diligence.Final JudgmentThe court entered judgment for AHP Servicing, LLC and Jorge Newbery, rejecting all of Oak Harbor’s claims for breach of contract, conversion, and turnover of assets.

I will say that the "underwriter" is nothing more than a deal finder/ money cruncher so I apologize if that's the term you're possibly misusing.  

If you're not an ethical Investor, then you can misuse this strategy just as you can misuse almost any other real estate strategy. 

Focus especially on anything from early 2022 onward, as that appears to be the period when Crew began experiencing trouble and allegedly started misusing funds in ways that suggest fraud.

This incentivizes the GP to stay engaged.Lenders can pursue guarantor for losses: Even with non-recourse loans, bridge lenders often require the GP to sign a limited guarantee to be liable for lender losses from things like misuse of rents or failure to maintain the property.