Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 2 days ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
6
Votes
Cheng Chu
6
Votes |
21
Posts

How to think about using leverage to maximize returns

Cheng Chu
Posted

As a example, if you had 200K in cash, you could invest this in real estate with these 2 options.

Options 1: buy a house worth 200k in cash.  No mortgage.   Let's say you can cash flow 1200/month

Or

Option 2: buy 4 houses each worth 200K but using leverage, 75% LTV(50K down payment, 150K mortgage, 30 yrs loan at currently 7% interest rates)

let's say after PITI, you cash flow 0 under ideal circumstances(no major cap ex, no prolonged vacancies)

What is the better investment with higher returns long term?  I think it would depend on the location and whether you plan to hold for the long term or cash out at some point. 

decision making can be different in these 2 scenarios:

Scenario A(high appreciation/high rent growth area):  If your house appreciation + rent growth outpace 7%, perhaps option 2 might be the better choice and leverage may amplify your returns.  Although more house means more things that can potentially break and need repairs.  And in "hot markets", there's a risk of property prices going down and you run the risk of being "overleveraged" if vacancies go up.   

Scenario B(low appreciation/low rent growth area):  in this scenario, I think option 1 might be a better investment.  at current interest rates, it just doesn't make sense to leverage if you don't expense house prices to go up.  


Am I thinking about this correctly?  A lot of people say debt paydown is another benefit.  I think with 30 yr amortization, the paydown on principal is minimal in the first few years and I don't see much benefit.  If you are going to a hold house for 30 yrs, capex expenses also each up much of your cash flow as the houses get older.  

Loading replies...