Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
14
Votes
Michael Shepherd
  • Investor
  • United States
14
Votes |
21
Posts

LLC collecting rent - For an out of state investor

Michael Shepherd
  • Investor
  • United States
Posted

Hello, 

I'm an out of state investor who lives in CA and invests in MI. My current entity structure is that I have a WY LLC as my Mother company and a MI LLC as my real estate holding holding company in MI. However I have yet to transfer my properties over to the MI LLC because there was a few things I was unsure on.

Firstly, How should rent be collected in the entity structure? I'm under the interpretation that rent should be collected by my MI LLC, then paid to my WY LLC, and then deposited to my personal bank account. Is this correct?

Secondly, I currently have a bank account for both of my LLCs at the same bank in MI. Is this correct, or should I have a WY bank account for my WY LLC? I'm worried about getting double taxed.

Thirdly, The business who set up my LLCs are telling me I do not need a foreign entity for my WY LLC in MI because "The subsidiaries being in Michigan are considered disregarded entities. Because they are owned by a WY entity, the taxes flow to the WY entity first, disregarding taxes from the subs. WY does not have state income tax as it flows through to your personals." - Is this correct because I've heard other things?

Thanks for any and all feedback :D 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

277
Posts
202
Votes
Katie Balatbat
  • CPA and Attorney
  • San Diego, attorney
202
Votes |
277
Posts
Katie Balatbat
  • CPA and Attorney
  • San Diego, attorney
Replied

@Michael Shepherd

Also be careful of California since you are a California resident.  You'll want to look into the very broad interpretation of what constitutes doing business by the CA FTB and see if it applies to you.  You may very well find that you now have to pay $800 for both LLCs to the state of California.  Remember that California does not recognize series LLCs.

*This post does not create an attorney-client or CPA-Client relationship.  The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon.  Readers are advised to seek professional advice.

Loading replies...