Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
3
Votes
Alex Smith
3
Votes |
11
Posts

12 Month Lease vs short term renewal Question.

Alex Smith
Posted

Hello everyone,

I have a lease renewal question from a landlord’s perspective. I currently have a rental property with a lease set to expire at the end of July, which is typically considered the high season in this area. The lease is a standard California agreement that allows for a month-to-month arrangement after the initial term ends.

Here’s the situation: the tenant has expressed interest in extending their stay only through the end of October, rather than signing a new 12-month lease. My concern is that this would push the property’s availability into the slower rental season, potentially making it more difficult to find a new tenant and possibly leaving the unit vacant for an extended period.

Is it common practice for landlords to require tenants to either sign a full 12-month renewal or vacate at the end of the current lease term? I’d appreciate any insights or best practices others have used in similar scenarios.

Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

127
Posts
85
Votes
Replied

Hello Alex,

I hope you're doing well. Generally, California is a very tenant friendly state and there are a lot of protective laws at both the state and city level in favor of tenants. Signing a full 12 month lease is possible, however, they may likely break the lease and your ability to pursue them for the damages may vary depending on state statutes and local city ordinances. Allowing them to stay beyond the lease terms in a month to month tenancy can allow you to continue to lease the premises, with a potential rent increase because its month to month, but not have any broken lease situation. However, it does come with the draw back of them likely leaving at the end of October and you being stuck without tenants during a potential slow season. As you mentioned, you could simply not renew the lease with them and set the expectation/send the notice that they must vacate at the end of the lease term so you can then lease to tenants willing to stay for the full 12 month term. This could allow you to re-rent your property during peak renting periods.

Note: This information is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, financial, or investment advice. No attorney-client, fiduciary, or professional relationship is established through this communication.

Loading replies...