Thanks for the replies!
I tend to have similar views about the balance as the majority it looks like.
I view it as the option to execute on the highest and best use of the income stream at with time as the critical actor. It seems apparent to me that actually using it to pay down debt is counter productive, until you're ready to refinance if that's your objective.
It makes more sense to me to save the cash flow (true cash flow, not vacancy/maint expense savings) in a stockpile to use it when an opportunity comes along, whether that looks like a new property or an opportunity to improve either financially or physically the existing state of a income producing property.
The opportunity cost of something else coming a long is probably what I'm skirting around, but in my mind it makes sense to bring in a respect for time and opportunity to the equation.
I also feel like something I extrapolated from Gary Keller's Millionaire Real Estate Investor is worth sharing for anyone reading for nuggets. It touches on a lot of the sentiment shared above and brought a really interesting concept to my attention.
I almost exclusively use COC (Cash on Cash) return for my metric of choice when pulling the trigger. It makes sense, but it's a snapshot metric. The second I sign the closing docs and the title is transferred my initial cash I'm investing becomes equity.
Equity by nature is based on value and principal remaining on the loan, it's the difference of the two. The basis of the concept is as the debt is paid down, your ROE (return on equity) goes down. If COC is a snapshot metric, ROE is the operating metric. At a certain point, your ROE will sink to a point where the highest and best use of your equity/capital is NOT being invested in the property. In other words, the faster you pay down the loan, the faster your ROE sinks and you should do something about it!
Like most, I like seeing numbers to instill concepts, so lets assume:
Purchase Price = 100K
Down Payment = 20K = Equity (for easy math, assuming no equity is in the deal)
Loan = 80K
For simplicity lets assume after taxes, insurance, vacancy, property management, and maint/repairs/capex, the property cashflows $3.5K/yr.
Therefore the COC is 3.5K / 20K = 17.5%
Now, lets look a few years into the future. For easy math, value appreciation, rent appreciation, and tax benefits are being omitted:
Value = 100K
Loan = 65K
Equity = 35K
ROE = $3.5K/35K = 10%
Ok, 10% isn't bad, I'll take it...fast forward a few more years:
Value = 100K
Loan = 50K
Equity = 50K
ROE = $3.5K/50K = 7%
Well, 7% is the stock market average right?...lets pay down all that debt and be "risk" free
Value = 100K
Loan = 0
Equity = 100K
ROE = $3.5K/100K = 3.5%
At least I'm beating the nominal 3% inflation rate...
A disclaimer, I'm leaving out a lot of important variables for simplicity of math to help uncover the trend I was trying to point out. Most of the variables that move over time only exasperate this trend. The only thing I can put my finger on that would reverse the trend is a non-proportional increase in rent appreciation compared to a slower value appreciation. Even so, I think they generally trend in a linear fashion and generally nullify each other relative to the ROE issue.
I went way over the top on this explanation, but it was good for me.
I hope you've also enjoyed it. Please let me know if you have feedback for me or have differing opinions. We're all in this together.
Take care,
-Sam