Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Adam S.

Adam S. has started 3 posts and replied 4 times.

Post: REO in Joint Jurisdiction

Adam S.Posted
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 0

I am an investor interesting in Purchasing an Maryland REO that is being marketed through an online auction company in Maryland. The property is unusual because it's divided between two different counties. It has two different tax IDs, but the same address.

The bank won ownership of the property through a sub-trustee auction in one of the counties, and the sub-trustee subsequently recorded the property in that county. However, the sub-trustee did not record the purchase in other county and also failed to accurately allocated the recording fees between the two counties. She recorded as if the entire property was in the one county.

Does anyone have any case law or references that explains how the law handles foreclosures in a shared jurisdiction property?

Post: Bank Owned Property in Two Jurisdictions

Adam S.Posted
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 0

Hello,

I am an investor interesting in Purchasing an Maryland REO that is being marketed through an online auction company in Maryland. The property is unusual because it's divided between two different counties. It has two different tax IDs, but the same address.

The bank won ownership of the property through a sub-trustee auction in one of the counties, and the sub-trustee subsequently recorded the property in that county.  However, the sub-trustee did not record the purchase in other county and also failed to accurately allocated the recording fees between the two counties.  She recorded as if the entire property was in the one county. 

Does anyone have any case law or references that explains how the law handles foreclosures in a shared jurisdiction property?

Post: Auction.com: Confusion over Contract Execution

Adam S.Posted
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 0

Thank you for the clarification. I really hope the deal goes through. I do think the wording of the email is a bit misleading.  

Post: Auction.com: Confusion over Contract Execution

Adam S.Posted
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 0

I'm getting conflicting information from Auction.com about the status of a contract I submitted after winning an REO auction.

About two weeks ago, I saw a desirable property marketed through auction.com, and after my due diligence, I decided to compete in the auction.  I won as the highest bidder; though, I did not meet the reserve price.  A contract specialist sent me a contract to sign, and I noted that the contract wanted me to use Servicelink as the closing agent.  I've heard enough bad stories to want to avoid Servicelink, so I decided to use a local closing agent and changed the contract to reflect my choice of closing agent.  I then emailed the signed contract to my contract specialist at Auction.com.

This is where the confusion starts.  Within an hour of sending in the contract, I received the below email from auction.com: 

"In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the auction event, as well as the specific terms of the Purchase Agreement with Joint Escrow Instructions and the Addendum to Purchase Agreement with Joint Escrow Instructions “SUBJECT TO” dated (the “Agreement”), the acceptance of your winning bid and purchase of the Property was subject to, and contingent upon, the Seller approving the purchase.

This letter shall serve as your written notice that the Seller has advised us of the acceptance of the terms of the Agreement. Please proceed with the necessary steps required to close this transaction as escrow is anticipated to close on or before forty-five (45) days from the date of Seller’s acceptance as set forth in the Purchase Agreement and Addendum to Purchase Agreement."

This email states the contract is accepted and to proceed with the closing.  I call auction.com, and the contract specialist claimed the email simply meant my offer price was accepted.  However, the contract specialist stated the contract had not been "executed".  He said to expect a signed contract to be sent over in the next week, starting the clock on the official 30 day closing period.  

Do I believe the email or the auction.com contract specialist? Also, the seller does not have a clearly designated representative.  A week has gone by, and I'm concerned that I'm wasting time not initiating the closing.  Also, if the closing period exceeds 30 days, I'm charged $50/day.  Also, I want to leave plenty of time for the closing to thoroughly clear the title and obtain title insurance.  


Has anyone had any experience with a situation like this?  Any recommendations?