Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Alex Rodeberg

Alex Rodeberg has started 2 posts and replied 2 times.

My father and uncle own 124 residential units with cashflow around $520,000/yr. This isn't including a management since they currently do it themselves. They are now looking to wind-down and focus on commercial properties while letting management take care of their units. They want to know if they should start hiring in-house employees or simply let a third-party management company do it.

I've been talking to management companies and getting quotes of 8% of gross rents for the entire portfolio. I've also done some research on here and throughout reddit where people hate management companies so I looked into seeing what an in-house management team would cost.

1 FT property manager = $45,000

1 FT Handyman = $40,000

PT bookkeeper = $20,000

Leasing an office = $15,000

Paying employees insurance = ?

Paying for vehicles or gas = ?

Software = ?

Total might be around $140k-$150k a year for in-house management, this is my estimate, I could be way off. I'm sure this also comes with a lot of it's own hassles that can't really be accounted for.

The management companies are charging 8% of gross rents collected. Gross rents are $1.12 million/year, at 8% that would be around $90k a year. The big issue I see online is that management companies might overcharge for repairs or add in fees here and there. \

Would it still be worth hiring in-house? If not, when does in-house become worth it?

My father and uncle own 124 residential units with cashflow around $520,000/yr. This isn't including a management since they currently do it themselves. They are now looking to wind-down and focus on commercial properties while letting management take care of their units. They want to know if they should start hiring in-house employees or simply let a third-party management company do it.

I've been talking to management companies and getting quotes of 8% of gross rents for the entire portfolio. I've also done some research on here and throughout reddit where people hate management companies so I looked into seeing what an in-house management team would cost. 

1 FT property manager = $45,000 

1 FT Handyman = $40,000

PT bookkeeper = $20,000

Leasing an office = $15,000

Paying employees insurance = ?

Paying for vehicles or gas = ?

Software = ?

Total might be around $140k-$150k a year for in-house management, this is my estimate, I could be way off. I'm sure this also comes with a lot of it's own hassles that can't really be accounted for.

The management companies are charging 8% of gross rents collected. Gross rents are $1.12 million/year, at 8% that would be around $90k a year. The big issue I see online is that management companies might overcharge for repairs or add in fees here and there. \

Would it still be worth hiring in-house? If not, when does in-house become worth it?