All Forum Posts by: Anna Kash
Anna Kash has started 1 posts and replied 5 times.
Post: Los Angeles pharmacist new to real estate

- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 5
- Votes 3
Originally posted by @Eric Carr:
In LA, the commission is generally 2.5% - other states, 3% is common. there are top agents who sell very expensive property that can ask for more
As far as schooling, no one is ever going to ask you or judge you by which school you took your courses at. I'd search for something either convenient, offers value, and has remote options - I think that's legal, and works for you. You want to learn and you want to be prepared for the test. There are youtube videos and services like ExamPrep that can help you get ready for the exam once you've completed the courses
Sounds good, thanks for all the value Eric!
Post: Los Angeles pharmacist new to real estate

- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 5
- Votes 3
Originally posted by @Dara Sin:
@Anna Kash I’m a pharmacist too. Looking to also invest in real estate. Best luck on your journey :)
Likewise! Are you in the LA area?
Post: Los Angeles pharmacist new to real estate

- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 5
- Votes 3
Originally posted by @Eric Carr:
The commission part - that is a strategy and a reason. Factor how many properties a year you will purchase and or sell, factor that in to the costs and time of being licensed. There should be a return on investment here too. If you buy one property every 3 years, might not make sense, know what I mean?
There are a lot of ways to use the commissions. In a hot market, offer your percentage to the listing agent - that might move you to the top of the offers, use it in on repairs in escrow, forfeit it for lower purchase price, credit the seller, roll it back into the principle, or into the next property. The broker can take anywhere from 10% of commissions - I've heard as high as 45% but usually around 35%-40% for new agents. There are smaller brokers and other ways to get this done rather than joining a large co like Remax, Rodeo, etc. Some of the fees surrounding your license are renewals, MLS, Supra, "Realtor" dues, which are mandatory for the full time agent, some might not in your case. For you, if it weren't for your plan to use your license in your own purchases and sales commissions strategy, I'd say skip it - since you don't intend on becoming an agent for hire, which is a ton of full time work. But since you are incorporating the license into your investing plan, get it and find the right broker. It will cost something. Or become a broker! Either way, once you start investing, you might find that friends start asking you to be their agent
As far as self study, the information is out there. The courses and exam are organized for you, but totally possible to learn on your own - the info is out there. You must complete the required courses to be eligible for the exam so self study isn't an option per se if you decide to get licensed. If you choose the self study route with no intention of taking the exam, start by looking at the core modules of the agent courses, and start following that trail. The information is out there, you'll have to track it down and put it all together. If you decide to get licensed, not just to learn, but to use it in your investing (seriously), find a school near you
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the quick response and ideas on how to use commissions. Just out of curiosity, what percent do you take away? Always can pm me if don’t want to disclose. Is There a program you can recommend to take those eligible courses to sit for the exam? There are so many out there and I’d like one primarily and has a good rep for California agents. I know there are schools as well as I’ve researched, just would prefer to do the studying remotely and at my own pace. THANKS again for all your time and detailed response.
Anna
Post: Los Angeles pharmacist new to real estate

- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 5
- Votes 3
Originally posted by @Eric Carr:
Your friend means well but that is false. Being licensed can be a great part of your strategy, however, figure out how being licensed will benefit you, how the pieces will fit together for the end game. You don't need to be licensed to buy or sell your own property. If you're licensed or unlicensed, will determine how you negotiate buyer side commissions. If you're a licensed agent, you'll need to hang your license under a broker.
Depending on your plan, you might not need to be licensed. If you're just looking to learn the process, the knowledge is out there. If it's something you might get very serious about, maybe time to pursue it.
What are your ultimate goals as of now?
Hi Eric,
Appreciate your response. I think part of the reason I want to be licensed is to earn the commission a realtor gains from buying/selling property. Meaning I will be the realtor involved in my transaction. Negotiate better? I realize I need to hang my license under a broker, for some fees correct? Someone earlier commented it takes $5k a year to maintain a realtor license per year in California... can you break down for me why?
Another part of the reason is to learn the process, the terms, etc. For someone new, where do you recommend I get this knowledge from? BP articles? Other sites/podcasts? Any info is appreciated. Thanks!
Post: Los Angeles pharmacist new to real estate

- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 5
- Votes 3
Hello all,
Wanted to introduce myself. My name is Anna and I am currently working on my realtor license. I’m also a pharmacist working in the crazy retail setting (all the pharmacists on here know the situation).
Excited to learn more from other members of this forum.
Part of the reason I am working on my license is to gain knowledge and possibly use myself in future transactions. Is this possible? I had a friend recently tell me, the seller won’t sell to me if they find out I am the realtor in the transaction (possibly bc of the money I would save).
Has anyone heard something like this?
Looking forward to learning each day on BP!