Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris John

Chris John has started 12 posts and replied 643 times.

@Jacob Krafka

I'd love to hear what a "typical" deal would look like in Colorado right now.  What could I expect if I wanted to deploy 100-150k using conventional funding without having to "look for a deal"?  If it's better than what I'm expecting in mutual funds for the next few years, I might be interested.

Thanks

Mutual funds (because I'm too lazy to look for deals).  Deals will come back someday.  They always do...

Post: Housing crash deniers ???

Chris JohnPosted
  • Posts 662
  • Votes 928
I'm not sure that median month over month prices is necessarily a fair barometer of the market.  I'd go more for price per square foot.  

It makes a lot of sense to me that the first people to not bother listing their houses would be the wealthy as their houses just got inordinately expensive on a monthly basis.  I'm not saying that we're not seeing a drop in housing prices in general, just that median price could easily be compromised by a shift to a larger percent of the market being made up with lower cost housing.  

@Sean Cassidy

I don't know @Patricia Steiner, but I can assume based on her post to votes ratio that she knows a lot more than the two of us combined.  (My limited knowledge + your distinct lack of knowledge (and class) < Patricia's knowledge).

Thanks for the laugh, troll.  Again though, if I'm wrong, please come back with your tens of millions in STYLE to let me know I'm wrong!!!  LOL.

I'll gladly give you the last word on this...

@Sean Cassidy

"You are extremely talented. Every sinfgle comment you made is wrong and completely misinformed. Did you pass the real estate test? I am in the process of retaining an attorney that won a $51 million judgment aagainst a landlord for one individual. So I will now be pursuing the real estate agent as well. Thank you I had not thought of that."

Mighty big talk for a guy living in a moldy apartment towards someone trying to give you advice.  Please come back on and brag when you get your windfall.  I'll happily eat crow.

PS.  I'd ditch the broken leg lady beforehand though.  If you can't get rid of her with a moldy apartment, imagine how difficult it'll be when you're in a mansion with all of your sports cars?

@Ben Cogdell

I'd keep the snowbird.  If you don't have a clear direction, there's no reason to upset their plans as they had nothing to do with it.  No reason to throw bad juju into the universe imo.

Post: Housing crash deniers ???

Chris JohnPosted
  • Posts 662
  • Votes 928

I think the issue is the magnitude of a crash as much as whether there's a crash or not.  In 2009, there were cheap houses EVERYWHERE.  The number of cheap houses changing hands was IMMENSE.

Even if the market crashes now, I can't fathom it will be nearly the same.  If prices drop, it will still be on a very small pool of available houses.  If people's portfolios go upside down, they won't care as long as they can cashflow it every month.  And, since most of us are locked in under 4%, that's a lot of houses that will NOT be hitting the market. 

So, even if there is a "crash", it won't be anything like 2009 because:

1.  The sheer number of houses will be minuscule in comparison.

2.  There are a ton of buyers champing at the bit to get into this "crash".  If/as prices drop, the new, lower prices will be met with more and more buyers.

Definitely seeing the prices decline and expect to continue to see that continue, but not holding my breathe on buying $60k houses in Cali again anytime soon...

Post: Insurance for House Hack

Chris JohnPosted
  • Posts 662
  • Votes 928

@Mike Hinkley

I just wanted to throw out that it probably wouldn't cost much to turn that doorway into a wall (unless you'd like to keep the door for whatever reason).  Just a thought as I know it would be my preference under those circumstances.

Best wishes

Post: Housing crash deniers ???

Chris JohnPosted
  • Posts 662
  • Votes 928

I mean, appreciation is nice so that you can refinance and buy more...

Post: Housing crash deniers ???

Chris JohnPosted
  • Posts 662
  • Votes 928

It does make me laugh that some of you think that it's literally impossible for either BlackRock or BlackStone (or whoever ) to fail.  Again, I'm not saying I think it's going to happen as I have NO IDEA what they're finances are.  However, Rome fell, so sure as heck a financial investment company can.

Also, I've already linked an article where they're slowing withdrawals to remain liquid.  That must mean that it's possible to get withdrawals, no?  Otherwise people wouldn't have theirs slowed.  Again, not saying that they're on their way to failure, but sheesh, people want more money back than they can accommodate at the moment.  Is that not EXACTLY what we're talking about?

Finally, none of these financial institutions really has their own money.  They're investing on behalf of others.  It's all institutional pension money?  Fine.  Those institutional pensions don't really have their own money either.  It always tracks back to the guy buying the insurance each year, depositing money into a retirement account each month, etc.  If enough of those guys change their mind, the seas will ABSOLUTELY change.  It would be impossible not to.

Again, I'm not saying this is likely.  I don't know the exact mechanisms behind how it would happen, etc.  But ultimately, there has to be money on the other side of a sale.  If institutional investors decide to sell, are forced to sell, whatever, someone has to be on the other side of that transaction with money and that's hard to do if enough houses are brought to market.