Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris Mason

Chris Mason has started 100 posts and replied 9560 times.

Post: Non QM DSCR loan rates

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

Insufficient information, really. DSCR could be 0.8 for all we know, in which case OP is lucky to get any loan at all. Also, no mention of fees, fico score, property details, etc.

Post: LENDER - Does anyone have experience with Stratton Equities?

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

No idea, never heard of them.

But who names their company after the Wolf of Wall Street company, even using their lion logo? The film isn't supposed to be a how-to guide....

Post: New Build Construction loan/conventional mortgage

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

Just go get it done, then refinance later on when rates drop (as part of the 40+ year pattern).

Post: Lender about to decline my loan

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Quote from @Joe Splitrock:
Quote from @Chris Mason:
Quote from @Joe Splitrock:
Quote from @Frank Agyeman-Duah:

@Matt Devincenzo

The new loan will be owner occupied. The refinance on my current home on date on 1/31/2022.


 That is the problem, you can't owner occupy two properties. Look at the loan documents you signed during your 1/31/2022 refinance and it likely has time period requirement for owner occupancy. Taking out a second owner occupied mortgage in March, means you cannot owner occupy both properties. One of them needs to be an investment loan. The low down payment options are ONLY for owner occupied, not for investors. These programs are designed to encourage home ownership, not for investors to profit from. You can move out of owner occupied and keep your owner occupied loan only after occupancy time frames have passed. That could be 6 or 12 months, but either way it is more than 2 months.

 Yeah, but it's actually a glitch in the matrix. At a company I used to be at, I had a hyper-rule-follower-borrower who was refinancing their primary residence they intended to move out of in a few months in order to convert it to a rental. So they wanted to do it as an investment property mortgage, thinking they are being good rule followers, right? I pushed back, they insisted. It's their loan application and their signature on all that paperwork, so ultimately they are the boss, and I did as requested. Submitted it as an investment property mortgage. 

The underwriter suspended it, and dressed me down, saying that giving the investment property interest rate to someone currently living at the property in question was abusive and predatory (the UW assumed it was my idea). But our hyper rule follower borrower didn't want to put themselves in a position of possibly being accused of mortgage fraud in the future. So the refinance applicant withdrew the loan application entirely, because neither of these two parties was willing to budge (LOL @ how rare this was, we had the consumer insisting that they wanted a HIGHER interest rate, and the underwriter insisting that they are REQUIRED to get the LOWER interest rate!).

So even if OP had tried to go the route suggested ("if you aren't going to live there for a year, then it's an investment property, rather than owner occupied"), that wouldn't have guaranteed a positive outcome. 

Glitch in the matrix. 


 I think the answer in that case is, if you are not going to live there a year, don't refinance until you move out. The lender should also alert any borrower to not write any other loans until after closing. At least not without checking with the lender. No refinances, no car loans, don't even open credit cards. My lender tells me that every time we start the loan process. You can sometimes do things concurrently, but always check with your lender instead of surprising your lender.


 I mean, if that were the case, so be it. It could just be a rule that you can't refinance if you plan on moving in a year. And if that were the rule, printed in black and white, that would be totally fine. 

It's the gray area matrix glitch stuff that is annoying. 

Post: Lender about to decline my loan

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Quote from @Joe Splitrock:
Quote from @Frank Agyeman-Duah:

@Matt Devincenzo

The new loan will be owner occupied. The refinance on my current home on date on 1/31/2022.


 That is the problem, you can't owner occupy two properties. Look at the loan documents you signed during your 1/31/2022 refinance and it likely has time period requirement for owner occupancy. Taking out a second owner occupied mortgage in March, means you cannot owner occupy both properties. One of them needs to be an investment loan. The low down payment options are ONLY for owner occupied, not for investors. These programs are designed to encourage home ownership, not for investors to profit from. You can move out of owner occupied and keep your owner occupied loan only after occupancy time frames have passed. That could be 6 or 12 months, but either way it is more than 2 months.

 Yeah, but it's actually a glitch in the matrix. At a company I used to be at, I had a hyper-rule-follower-borrower who was refinancing their primary residence they intended to move out of in a few months in order to convert it to a rental. So they wanted to do it as an investment property mortgage, thinking they are being good rule followers, right? I pushed back, they insisted. It's their loan application and their signature on all that paperwork, so ultimately they are the boss, and I did as requested. Submitted it as an investment property mortgage. 

The underwriter suspended it, and dressed me down, saying that giving the investment property interest rate to someone currently living at the property in question was abusive and predatory (the UW assumed it was my idea). But our hyper rule follower borrower didn't want to put themselves in a position of possibly being accused of mortgage fraud in the future. So the refinance applicant withdrew the loan application entirely, because neither of these two parties was willing to budge (LOL @ how rare this was, we had the consumer insisting that they wanted a HIGHER interest rate, and the underwriter insisting that they are REQUIRED to get the LOWER interest rate!).

So even if OP had tried to go the route suggested ("if you aren't going to live there for a year, then it's an investment property, rather than owner occupied"), that wouldn't have guaranteed a positive outcome. 

Glitch in the matrix. 

Post: Mortgage Getting Called in During Recession

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Quote from @Sam Zawatsky:

@Chris Mason My current rental property that I own was originally purchased with a homeowner loan. I lived in it for 2.5 years and then had to move so I rented it out. Could this be an issue, or no because I lived in it for at least a year?


 No issue, you're fine, you fulfilled your owner occupancy promise and didn't commit fraud. 

Post: Mortgage Getting Called in During Recession

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Quote from @Sam Zawatsky:

What are your experiences or knowledge about the potential of mortgages getting called in during a recession? I was informed by a family member that someone they knew had a mortgage called in on one of their investment properties in 2009 (meaning that the lender sent them a notice that they must immediately pay their remaining entire principal balance , or go into foreclosure). Is this a real possibility, and something to consider when looking into purchasing / cash out refinancing this year? There has been the consistent threat of a market crash, and while I'm not so concerned with the housing prices, I am concerned about the possibility of not being able to get a cash out refinance mortgage with under a 7 percent interest rate on BRRRR properties or getting my existing mortgages called in, causing foreclosure or bankruptcy. Any thoughts?

 Your friend didn't tell you the whole story. No one ever does. The person with bad credit never takes responsibility for that fact, they blame it on the car salesman who ran his credit 10 times, for example. They don't tell you about the car repo and pattern of missing credit card payments.

As others mentioned, one possibility is that it was a HELOC. In that case, that is the whole story, HELOCs got called, it happened. In 2020, the availability of new HELOCs plummeted to nearly zero.

If it was a 1st position mortgage in 2009, it could be that they also started enforcing owner occupancy requirements. Remember the "stripper scene" in the Big Short where she said she owned 5 houses ("and a condo")? She probably bought all five as an owner occupant (chasing the lower down payment and better rates), months apart. So there's a really good chance that character would have had several mortgages called due when the SHTF. But she wouldn't tell you that she committed mortgage fraud several times in a row, she'd just say the banks are evil nefarious bad guys out to get her, etc (also, here's your excuse to watch the stripper scene again for, uh, research). 

Post: Owner Occupied Question

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Quote from @Nicholas D'Andrea:

BP Community,


I purchased a SFH in July 2021. Currently, I am house hacking. I found a deal where the numbers work for my second property. I do not have enough cash to put down 20% and use it as an investment property. I would need to put down 10-15% and owner occupy. Does anyone know of a way around the one-year owner-occupied clause in most mortgages?

Appreciate your comments.


 It's kind of a gray area rule. If you purchased that first house in July 2021 with the intent of moving out in less than a year, that's fraud.

However, if you moved in with that intent to live there a year, and something came up that you didn't anticipate, there are three possibilities.

1) It sails through underwriting, they don't even notice. Can't really plan for this, the "spaghetti strategy" isn't great when there's an earnest money deposit on the line. Cleared to close.

2) They do notice, and ask you to document your unforeseen circumstance. You could not have anticipated that your mother 150 miles away got terminal brain cancer, necessitating that you move closer to her for her last 6-9 months alive, for example, or that there's mold that wasn't disclosed, which is making your pregnant wife ill. Or you got a job transfer across the country. Cleared to close.

3) They do notice, and you talk about house hacking and numbers and cap rates and all that. Loan denied. 

Post: Navy Federal Mortgage loan officer

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791

A place like that, you're going to have local realtors telling their clients not to use you.

Example from just today: https://www.reddit.com/r/RealE... (note which comment is top-voted, that sub is obviously full of realtors)

Multiply that by a zillion realtors all over the country, all telling their clients NOT to work with you..

That being said, not a lot of people are hiring loan officers right now. So there's an argument to be made for taking what you can get. NFCU is probably a perfectly fine place to learn the basic mechanics of the job, so take their $20k/hr for that. As soon as you have that under your belt, GTFO and go to a local place in your own community. That's where you will learn how to work with local realtors (rather than being their enemy, which is all NFCU can teach you), drum up business yourself, and so on.

Also, fair warning. A place like that, they're going to focus on "how to use our software" as the mechanics of the job. Try to ignore that as much as possible, and focus on the math behind it. Software is dime a dozen, comes and goes, but math is math. 

Post: Visio lending rental loan might get reported on personal credit f

Chris Mason
ModeratorPosted
  • Lender
  • California
  • Posts 9,935
  • Votes 10,791
Quote from @Smrithi Shashidhara:

Hi We were about to lock in a loan with visio lending for a short term rental(airbnb) investment property and the loan agent mentioned. The intent to go with them was to make sure we this deal doesn't affect our personal buying power.


That premise is flawed. DTI is calculated using monthly recurring liabilities, regardless of if they're on your credit or not. As anyone caught with an undisclosed child support obligation (typically not on credit in my state), paired with an otherwise borderline DTI, can attest to.