Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris Tran

Chris Tran has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the info! It seems like this is the way to go if you're aiming for lowest % down. 

When talking about FHA loans, if I do have the ability to qualify for a conventional loan instead of a FHA loan, is it more beneficial to go one way or the other? This would be for a rental investment property. Or is it a matter of doing the math on how much PMI costs, and how long it'll take to even out the costs of FHA vs conventional and compare that to how long I plan to hold the property (Is this how you would evaluate deciding between the two?)

I've been reading about FHA loans which require owner occupation. Can you occupy the property AND rent out rooms within the first year? Is it limited on house type (condo, townhouse, multi family, single family, etc.)