Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Diane Huetter

Diane Huetter has started 3 posts and replied 6 times.

I own a condo in California and have given more than 24 hours notice to tenant to schedule showings - but she has written back stating she does not give consent to my entering her unit.  She has acknowledged in writing that she understands that I have the right to enter with 24 hr notice, but she is making the claim that showing the unit interferes with her right to quiet enjoyment (claims that a prospective tenant took a photo of her unit without her permission, which I know is untrue as I walked each of the 4 prospects through individually).  Even though I know I have the legal right to show the unit, I am now hesitant to try - I worry she might create a scene in front of the prospects, etc.   Do I have any right to hold back a portion of her security deposit for lost rent this will cause? (since I may lose a month's rent if I cannot start showing to prospects until after she vacates unit)?   Or do you recommend I just proceed with the showings? 

I own a condo in California and have given more than 24 hours notice to tenant to schedule showings - but she has written back stating she does not give consent to my entering her unit.  She has acknowledged in writing that she understand that I have the right to enter with 24 hr notice, but she is making the claim that showing the unit interferes with her right to quiet enjoyment (claims that a prospective tenant took a photo of her unit without her permission, which I know is untrue as I walked each of the 4 prospects through individually).  Even though I know I have the legal right to show the unit, I am now hesitant to try - I worry she might create a scene in front of the prospects, etc.   Do I have any right to hold back a portion of her security deposit for lost rent this will cause? (since I may lose a month's rent if I cannot start showing to prospects until after she vacates unit)?   Or do you recommend I just proceed with the showings? 

Thank you Thomas!  Yes I believe he is.  I have tried to help him out by trying to get a tenant in there early, and again by offering to refund a few days of rent if he agrees to surrender unit a few days early, and he is now behaving like a sore loser because it didn't work out exactly the way he wanted it to.  I just wanted clarification as to whether or not I actually have the right to enter unit (with sufficient notice) to do maintenance such as repainting.  Thank you for your response, much appreciated.  

To Nathan:  thanks for your post.  Just making sure you saw this part of my post above: "A week after he gave notice, he asked me if I could please try to find someone who could start a lease by 3/15 (lease is up 3/31) I told him I would definitely *try* to do so, but made it very clear that he would still be on the hook for March rent if I could not find someone who wanted to start the lease early."

So that is why I did not list the unit as Available April 4 (you wrote I should have listed unit as Avail Mar 4 but I think you must have meant to say April 4).  Tenant wanted me to list it as available earlier. 

Also I posted:  I offered to reimburse him 3 days of March rent if he would surrender it March 29  - but he says the only way he will surrender early is on March 15 and if I agree to give him a refund of half of March rent. 

With this information - do you still feel I am being unreasonable?   

To Johann:  Yes, it seems Tenant is indeed being an *** for the hell of it.  He moved out a month before his lease was up.  A week after he gave notice, he asked me if I could please try to find someone who could start a lease by 3/15 (lease is up 3/31) I told him I would definitely *try* to do so, but made it very clear that he would still be on the hook for March rent if I could not find someone who wanted to start the lease early.  I listed it as available March 15, but everyone who came to view it wanted April 1 start-lease date, so I signed lease with tenant starting April 1. So he is upset and is now trying to make things difficult for me.   I offered to reimburse him 3 days of March rent if he would surrender it March 29 - but he says he will only surrender it March 15 if I refund half of March rent.  Yes, he is being a jerk - not to mention a fool not to at least accept 3 days rent reimbursement! 

To Kenny:  I like your idea of offering to return his security deposit sooner if he lets me come in and paint - that is a good motivator!   I will definitely give it a try, Thank you.! 

Is Landlord in California allowed to enter unit to repaint prior to tenant moving out?  My tenant's Lease is up 3/31 but he already moved out (but has not surrendered unit).  I notified him that I will need to enter unit to paint & do repairs (with 24 hour written notice).  He says I cannot enter unit to paint & do repairs until his lease is up.  Calif Civil Code 1954 states "Landlord my enter dwelling to make necessary or agreed repairs, decorations, alterations, or improvements..."  I interpret this to include repainting - is this correct?