Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: R Sean

R Sean has started 6 posts and replied 35 times.

Post: Columbus, OH - 6 rentals

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

Gross is... $3,775
NOI is...... $1,888 using 50% rule
Net............$1,888
Debt Service ($1,048) -financing all $150k @7.5% for 30yrs
Net.............$840 /month

OR $160/door/month

PURSUE if no red flags come up in repairs, maintenance, etc.

Post: Empty versus Drop Standards/Rent

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by Lucia Waibel:
I read quite a bit that it is better to leave a unit empty then to fill it by lowering your standards.

The economics would suggest otherwise. An empty unit equates to an 8+% drop in yearly rent for each month empty, wouldn't it be better to drop the rent and relax your standards a bit, rather then leaving a unit empty for too long?

For an 800.00 a month unit, three months empty winds up with a 25% loss of rent for the year or the equivalent of accepting a monthly rent of 600, and once the taxes, insurance, and maintenance are added to the equation, a loss for the year is pretty much guaranteed, oh the pleasure of dealing with tenants and having to kick in cash for the year !

So my question:

Wouldn't it be better to drop the 800 by at least 10% immediately, get well below the going rate right off the bat, and accept maybe a lower credit rating, you may not have to, as long as the deposits are there, and put the new tenant on a month-to-month contract?

When the economics allow,you can always increase the rents and go for a longer lease but at least the unit is not losing cash.

Lucia,

Great question, and one that we all face. My recommendation is to keep the 'face rent' the same and offer incentives, like free rent; HOWEVER, I suggest amortizing the free rent over the rental period to lessen the cash flow impact.

For example, in these cases I always favor a 13 month term with the 13th month free and that one month is spread out over the 13 month lease term.

Here is an example:

Monthly Rent: $800
Inducement: $800 (one month free)
Inducement per month: $61 ($800 / 13 months)
Net rent: $739

Hope that helps.

R Sean

Post: Anyone in/near Houston?

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

chris,

welcome. I am in houston and coincidentally live in Pearland too.

small world.

Post: Help anaylize this deal..

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by Jon Holdman:
In the first post Ken lists expenses of 46% of the collected rents, plus 5% for vacancy. Very close to the 50%. Expenses could easily be 60% or higher. Unlikely they will be much less than 50%.


Bingo Jon. In Houston, expenses at B/C+ complexes are 60%-65% of NOI not including capex. When underwriting, I always am conservative on CAPEX as those unexpected items can quickly render an asset into negative cash flow status. Not good.

Post: Help anaylize this deal..

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

Ken,

Unless contracts are unusual in that area, apartment leases are typically only one year long. The "4% vacancy" appears to be a projection, and given that turnover at some complexes can be as high as 25-50% in a year, I'd suggest winnowing down the 4% to 10-15%.

With that level of conservatism you have room in case things don't pan out as projected.

As for capex, I suggest looking at similar aged assets that have recently traded and get the offering memorandum with ACTUAL operating history to use as a basis for your estimates. Loopnet may have same.

Let us know how it goes.

Post: Help anaylize this deal..

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

Ken,

I won't question your assumptions, but 5% vacancy and NO capex seems very aggressive.

If, and a big IF, these are correct, your yield to equity is 28% ($27k / $90k)...which is good...and moreover your initial yield (or "going in" cap rate) is 11% ( $88k / $745k)...which is the sweet spot.

Pursue the deal.

Post: Please help 4 plex

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11
Originally posted by Greg Park:
IS this a good deal or just so so? Also, on a contract for deed could my credit get worse if I default? Thanks

Yes, this is a good deal.

Post: Please help 4 plex

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

Looks good to me @120k.

Using 50% rule you have 1,100/month less DS of $630, leaving $470 net or $117/door. This assumes NO repairs/ cap ex.

Looked at another way, this deal is yielding an 11% unlevered cash yield ($1,100*12 / 120,000k). Sweet spot.

Post: I am about to complete my 3rd deal, thoughts?

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

I look at it from an unleveraged standpoint...cash flow / investment....so if you generate $887.5/month using 50% rule or $10.6K year (aggresive cuz assumes 100% leased) over your $135.5 investment yields 7.9%. I don't know anyone who is paying sub 10%, so by my measurements, there are better deals to be had.

Post: Co Brokerage

R SeanPosted
  • Houston, TX
  • Posts 48
  • Votes 11

Simple question....is co-brokerage on multifamily typically an even split of the commission?

For example, a $100 apartment complex generates $6 commission upon sale, $3 of which goes to the buyers agent?

Thanks in advance!