Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jason C Wilkinson

Jason C Wilkinson has started 1 posts and replied 3 times.

Quote from @David C.:
Quote from @Jason C Wilkinson:

Hello everyone. I'm working with a friend who has many years as a Real Estate investor. We are considering starting our own property management company in California. Neither of us is a licensed broker however (required in California), so we are in discussions to possibly partner with a licensed broker so we can start the business. We will be managing the day to day and the broker will mostly be a 'silent partner'. I wanted to see if anyone has tried to structure a property management business this way. If so, what were some things that went well and what were some things that didn't go so great? Thanks.

Good question, I was wondering this myself. So I did some internet sleuthing.

If you are managing for compensation and for another, you need a CA broker license: CA B&P 10131

This Real Estate Bulletin talks about a broker's responsibility to supervise, and how they prosecute "rent-a-broker" (aka Silent Partner?) situations: Real Estate Bulletin Summer 2010 

If it's a property owned by your corporation, the management can be done by a corporate officer without a license: CA B&P 10133

Not sure if a property owned by an individual can be managed by an employee of that individual ... this is what I'd really like to know.  Or owned by a Corp managed by an employee.

There is a licensing exception for a resident manager ... CA law requires properties w 16 or more units to have a resident manager.


 thanks David. That bulletin was an interesting read. If I interpret it right, the broker is to supervise activities of licensed agents doing licensed agents work. But even if working under a brokers license, an unlicensed person can not do licensed agent work (such as showing a property for rent or collecting rents)? Am I right to interpret it that way? 

Hello everyone. I'm working with a friend who has many years as a Real Estate investor. We are considering starting our own property management company in California. Neither of us is a licensed broker however (required in California), so we are in discussions to possibly partner with a licensed broker so we can start the business. We will be managing the day to day and the broker will mostly be a 'silent partner'. I wanted to see if anyone has tried to structure a property management business this way. If so, what were some things that went well and what were some things that didn't go so great? Thanks.