Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jayson Trierweiler

Jayson Trierweiler has started 9 posts and replied 24 times.

Post: Best way to buy SFR as a group?

Jayson TrierweilerPosted
  • Carlsbad, CA
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 4

@Mack Benson

Thanks Mack! Can a joint venture be more than two people if my father in law wants in?

Post: Best way to buy SFR as a group?

Jayson TrierweilerPosted
  • Carlsbad, CA
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 4

My brother-in-law and I would like to invest in buy and hold, SFR, together. What is the best way to structure our partnership? LLC? Some other form of partnership?

Thanks!

I love this thread! I have been very very close on numerous occasions to buying TK properties (from "reputable" providers over the past year. I never pulled the trigger because I cannot make the numbers work due mainly to maintenance/capex. I heard tons of testimonials about how great TK was working out for people, but those people had all just bought their properties in the last 6 mo - 1 year. I'd like to hear from someone who bought a turnkey property 5 years ago and see how they are doing. Except that test won't work because they probably paid way less for the property so they might be doing great. 

For me it all boils down to this:

At current prices, long term TK investing won't pay out due to maint/capex costs.

Short term ( sell in 5 years or less) TK investing is very risky because the exit strategies are more than sketchy (closing costs, not much appreciation if any, lack of buyers due to imminent capex needed, etc.)  

I say all of that to say thanks @Joe Kim for the post!

Post: current 30 yr fixed rate?

Jayson TrierweilerPosted
  • Carlsbad, CA
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 4

What rate could I expect if I have a 775 credit score, 100k in the bank, stable job etc etc etc, for a 30 yr fixed rate, investment property, 20% down, 60k loan?

Thanks! 

Post: Closed on first rental property

Jayson TrierweilerPosted
  • Carlsbad, CA
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 4

@Alexander Price thanks for answering!

Post: Closed on first rental property

Jayson TrierweilerPosted
  • Carlsbad, CA
  • Posts 27
  • Votes 4

Congrats! I have been considering TK as well but I can't seem to make the numbers work when I factor in Cap Ex. I am also struggling with a viable exit strategy. Can you share your thoughts on those two things? (CapEx and exit strategy)

thanks!!

Originally posted by @Curt Davis:

 Get the highest gross cash flow you can and roll with it. 

I don't want to just hope for the best. This sounds a lot like gambling? If the gross cash flow is eaten up by vacancy, R&M, and CapEx, over 5-10 years then I haven't gained anything.

@Mike Dymski Thanks for the feedback! On my excel chart i can plug in remaining life in the "Life years" column so on any potential property I can plug in numbers as you suggest. I'll definitely consider LTV as well as adding those items. thanks again!

Essentially is as follows:

New Lease Fee (one month’s rent) + Expected Missed Rent + “Refresh” Cash

(Refresh Cash = the amount out of pocket to prepare the property for new tenants, after tenant deposit is spent)

It looks like this:

(A/B)+(A*C / B)+(D/B)

Where:

A = New lease fee (1 month's rent) ($1,000)

B = # of Months in lease (24)

C = Expected # of months vacant in-between tenants (1.5)

D = “Refresh” Cash ($500)

In this example:

($1,000/24) + ($1,000 * 1.5 / 24) + ($500/24)

Which is:

41.67 + 62.5 + 21 = $125 which is 13% of monthly rent in this scenario

The equation allows me to make a judgement call in many different scenarios. For some tenants maybe my refresh cash will be $300 and for some it may be $1000. In some markets maybe my expected months of vacancy would be 1 and in some cases 2. Etc. etc. etc.

Your thoughts? Too conservative? Too liberal? Pretty good?

When I use this methodology, on top of my capex/RM analysis, I can't see how 99.9% of turn-key opportunities could possibly make sense.

These assumptions are based on a particular sqr footage. But how do you think the basic methodology works?

thanks!

Item Cost Life years Months Cost Per Month
Roof $ 6,000.00 25 300 $ 20.00
HVAC $ 4,500.00 15 180 $ 25.00
Hot H2O $ 550.00 8 96 $ 5.73
Flooring Carpet $ 1,800.00 5 60 $ 30.00
Flooring Laminate Wood $ 1,800.00 10 120 $ 15.00
Interior Paint $ 2,500.00 6 72 $ 34.72
Exterior Paint $ 3,000.00 8 96 $ 31.25
Revamp Plumbing $ 1,500.00 20 240 $ 6.25
Revamp Electrical $ 3,500.00 30 360 $ 9.72
Misc $ 200.00 1 12 $ 16.67
Monthly CapEx Allowance _ _ _ $ 179.34